Surgery or Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Shahab Aldin Sattari, Ataollah Shahbandi, Ryan P. Lee, James Feghali, Jordina Rincon-Torroella, Wuyang Yang, Mostafa Abdulrahim, Sina Ahmadi, Raymond J. So, Alice Hung, Justin M. Caplan, Fernando Gonzalez, Rafael J. Tamargo, Judy Huang, Risheng Xu

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and Objective: Although randomized controlled trials have compared surgery versus endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms, the literature is sparse in terms of subgroup analysis for anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysm management. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to compare surgical versus endovascular treatment for ACoA aneurysms. Methods: Medline, PubMed, and Embase were searched from inception to December 12, 2022. Primary outcomes were post-treatment modified Rankin Scale (mRS) >2 and mortality. Secondary outcomes were aneurysm obliteration, retreatment and recurrence, rebleeding, technical failure, vessel rupture, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage-related hydrocephalus, symptomatic vasospasm, and stroke. Results: Eighteen studies yielded 2368 patients, from which 1196 (50.5%) and 1172 (49.4%) patients underwent surgery and endovascular treatment, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) of mortality was similar in total (OR = 0.92 [0.63–1.37], P = 0.69), ruptured (OR = 0.92 [0.62–1.36], P = 0.66), and unruptured cohorts (OR = 1.58 [0.06–39.60], P = 0.78). The OR of mRS > 2 was similar in total (OR = 0.75 [0.50–1.13], P = 0.17), ruptured (OR = 0.77 [0.49–1.20], P = 0.25), and unruptured cohorts (OR = 0.64 [0.21–1.96], P = 0.44). The OR of obliteration was higher with surgery in the total (OR = 2.52 [1.49–4.27], P = 0.0008) and ruptured cohorts (OR = 2.61 [1.33–5.10], P = 0.005) and unruptured group (OR = 3.46 [1.30–9.20], P = 0.01). The OR of retreatment was lower with surgery in the total (OR = 0.37 [0.17–0.76], P = 0.007) and ruptured cohorts (OR = 0.31 [0.11–0.89], P = 0.03), thought it was similar in the unruptured group (OR = 0.51 [0.08–3.03], P = 0.46). The OR of recurrence was lower with surgery in the total (OR = 0.22 [0.10, 0.47], P = 0.0001), ruptured (OR = 0.16 [0.03, 0.90], P = 0.04), and mixed (un) ruptured cohorts (OR = 0.22 [0.09–0.53], P = 0.0009). The OR of rebleeding in ruptured group was similar (OR = 0.66 [0.29–1.52], P = 0.33). The ORs of other outcomes were similar. Conclusions: ACoA aneurysms may be safely treated with either surgery or endovascular treatment, although microsurgical clipping demonstrates higher obliteration rates and lower rates of retreatment and recurrence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-44
Number of pages14
JournalWorld neurosurgery
Volume175
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2023

Keywords

  • Aneurysm
  • Anterior communicating artery
  • Clip
  • Coil
  • Endovascular
  • Meta-analysis
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgery or Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this