TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgeons’ perceptions on industry relations
T2 - A survey of 822 surgeons
AU - Altieri, Maria S.
AU - Yang, Jie
AU - Wang, Lily
AU - Yin, Donglei
AU - Talamini, Mark
AU - Pryor, Aurora D.
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - Background The relationships between industry and medical professionals are controversial. The purpose of our study was to evaluate surgeons' current opinions regarding the industry-surgery partnership, in addition to self-reported industry ties. Methods After institutional review board approval, a survey was sent via RedCap to 3,782 surgeons across the United States. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate the responses. Results The response rate was 23%. From the 822 responders, 226 (27%) reported at least one current relationship with industry, while 297 (36.1%) had at least one such relationship within the past 3 years. There was no difference between general surgery versus other surgical specialties (P =.5). Among the general surgery subspecialties, respondents in minimally invasive surgery/foregut had greater ties to industry compared to other subspecialties (P =.001). In addition, midcareer surgeons, male sex, and being on a reviewer/editorial board were associated with having industry ties (P <.05). Most surgeons (71%) believed that the relationships with industry are important for innovation. Conclusion Our study showed that relationships between surgeons and industry are common, because more than a quarter of our responders reported at least one current relationship. Industry relations are perceived as necessary for operative innovation.
AB - Background The relationships between industry and medical professionals are controversial. The purpose of our study was to evaluate surgeons' current opinions regarding the industry-surgery partnership, in addition to self-reported industry ties. Methods After institutional review board approval, a survey was sent via RedCap to 3,782 surgeons across the United States. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate the responses. Results The response rate was 23%. From the 822 responders, 226 (27%) reported at least one current relationship with industry, while 297 (36.1%) had at least one such relationship within the past 3 years. There was no difference between general surgery versus other surgical specialties (P =.5). Among the general surgery subspecialties, respondents in minimally invasive surgery/foregut had greater ties to industry compared to other subspecialties (P =.001). In addition, midcareer surgeons, male sex, and being on a reviewer/editorial board were associated with having industry ties (P <.05). Most surgeons (71%) believed that the relationships with industry are important for innovation. Conclusion Our study showed that relationships between surgeons and industry are common, because more than a quarter of our responders reported at least one current relationship. Industry relations are perceived as necessary for operative innovation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013647694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013647694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2017.01.010
DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2017.01.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 28242087
AN - SCOPUS:85013647694
SN - 0039-6060
VL - 162
SP - 164
EP - 173
JO - Surgery (United States)
JF - Surgery (United States)
IS - 1
ER -