TY - JOUR
T1 - Studying outcomes of intensive care unit survivors
T2 - Measuring exposures and outcomes
AU - Needham, Dale M.
AU - Dowdy, David W.
AU - Mendez-Tellez, Pedro A.
AU - Herridge, Margaret S.
AU - Pronovost, Peter J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Received: 22 December 2004 Accepted: 20 April 2005 Published online: 21 May 2005 © Springer-Verlag 2005 This research was supported by National Institutes of Health (ALI SCCOR Grant # P050 HL 73994-01). D.M.N. is supported by Clinician-Scientist Awards from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the University of Toronto, and a Detweiler Fellowship from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.
PY - 2005/9
Y1 - 2005/9
N2 - Background: Measurement of long-term outcomes and the patient and intensive care unit (ICU) factors predicting them present investigators with unique challenges. There is little systematic guidance for measuring these outcomes and exposures within the ICU setting. As a result measurement methods are often variable and noncomparable across studies. Methods: We use examples from the critical care literature to describe measurement as it relates to three key elements of clinical studies: subjects, outcomes and exposures, and time. Using this framework we review the principles and challenges of measurement and make recommendations for long-term outcomes research in the field of critical care medicine. Discussion: Relevant challenges discussed include: (a) selection bias and heterogeneity of ICU research subjects, (b) appropriate selection and measurement of outcome and exposure variables, and (c) accounting for the effect of time in the exposure-outcome relationship, including measurement of baseline data and time-varying variables. Conclusions: Addressing these methodological challenges will advance research aimed at improving the long-term outcomes of ICU survivors.
AB - Background: Measurement of long-term outcomes and the patient and intensive care unit (ICU) factors predicting them present investigators with unique challenges. There is little systematic guidance for measuring these outcomes and exposures within the ICU setting. As a result measurement methods are often variable and noncomparable across studies. Methods: We use examples from the critical care literature to describe measurement as it relates to three key elements of clinical studies: subjects, outcomes and exposures, and time. Using this framework we review the principles and challenges of measurement and make recommendations for long-term outcomes research in the field of critical care medicine. Discussion: Relevant challenges discussed include: (a) selection bias and heterogeneity of ICU research subjects, (b) appropriate selection and measurement of outcome and exposure variables, and (c) accounting for the effect of time in the exposure-outcome relationship, including measurement of baseline data and time-varying variables. Conclusions: Addressing these methodological challenges will advance research aimed at improving the long-term outcomes of ICU survivors.
KW - Epidemiological methods
KW - Outcome assessment (health care)
KW - Process assessment (health care)
KW - Prospective studies
KW - Respiratory distress syndrome, adult
KW - Risk factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25144493654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25144493654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00134-005-2656-7
DO - 10.1007/s00134-005-2656-7
M3 - Review article
C2 - 15909169
AN - SCOPUS:25144493654
SN - 0342-4642
VL - 31
SP - 1153
EP - 1160
JO - Intensive Care Medicine
JF - Intensive Care Medicine
IS - 9
ER -