TY - JOUR
T1 - Standardized Seidel test to evaluate different sutureless cataract incision configurations
AU - May, William N.
AU - Castro-Combs, Juan
AU - Quinto, Gilherme G.
AU - Kashiwabuchi, Renata
AU - Gower, Emily W.
AU - Behrens, Ashley
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the May Vision Foundation , Los Angeles, California; an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness , New York, New York, to Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland; and a Research to Prevent Blindness Althouse Special Scholars Award and Fight For Sight, New York, New York, USA
PY - 2010/6
Y1 - 2010/6
N2 - Purpose: To compare aqueous outflow and India ink inflow to evaluate clear corneal incisions (CCIs). Setting: Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Methods: Two 25-gauge needles connected to a salt solution bag and to a digital manometer were inserted through the limbus of human donor corneas 120 degrees apart from each other. Three 2.75 mm wide incisions were created in a different third of each cornea as follows: single-plane 1.50 mm tunnel length, single-plane 3.00 mm tunnel length, and 2-step 3.00 mm tunnel length. The Seidel test was evaluated at 5 intraocular pressures (IOPs) in the physiologic range. A masked observer evaluated the recorded tests. With a preset 10 mm Hg IOP, India ink was applied to the incision site and a sudden IOP fluctuation induced. India ink influx was outlined and measured by planimetry. Results: With the 1.5 mm single-plain incisions, all 6 globes showed inflow and outflow. With the 3.0 mm single-plain incisions, all 6 globes showed inflow and 2 showed outflow by the Seidel test. With the 3.0 mm 2-step incisions, 2 globes showed inflow and 3 had positive Seidel test results. Area and length of inflow were statistically significantly greater with the 2 single-planed incisions than with the 2-step incisions. Conclusion: This human ex vivo model showed that wound deformation produced during Seidel testing might not be an accurate way to predict the risk for bacterial invasion in the early postoperative period. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
AB - Purpose: To compare aqueous outflow and India ink inflow to evaluate clear corneal incisions (CCIs). Setting: Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Methods: Two 25-gauge needles connected to a salt solution bag and to a digital manometer were inserted through the limbus of human donor corneas 120 degrees apart from each other. Three 2.75 mm wide incisions were created in a different third of each cornea as follows: single-plane 1.50 mm tunnel length, single-plane 3.00 mm tunnel length, and 2-step 3.00 mm tunnel length. The Seidel test was evaluated at 5 intraocular pressures (IOPs) in the physiologic range. A masked observer evaluated the recorded tests. With a preset 10 mm Hg IOP, India ink was applied to the incision site and a sudden IOP fluctuation induced. India ink influx was outlined and measured by planimetry. Results: With the 1.5 mm single-plain incisions, all 6 globes showed inflow and outflow. With the 3.0 mm single-plain incisions, all 6 globes showed inflow and 2 showed outflow by the Seidel test. With the 3.0 mm 2-step incisions, 2 globes showed inflow and 3 had positive Seidel test results. Area and length of inflow were statistically significantly greater with the 2 single-planed incisions than with the 2-step incisions. Conclusion: This human ex vivo model showed that wound deformation produced during Seidel testing might not be an accurate way to predict the risk for bacterial invasion in the early postoperative period. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952526196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952526196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.036
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.036
M3 - Article
C2 - 20494775
AN - SCOPUS:77952526196
SN - 0886-3350
VL - 36
SP - 1011
EP - 1017
JO - Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
JF - Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
IS - 6
ER -