Stakeholder views on privatization of the Quebec health care system

Marie Pascale Pomey; Raymond Hudon; Nicolas Van Schendel; Elisabeth Martin; Pierre Gerlier Forest

doi:10.3138/cpp.2015-056

Stakeholder views on privatization of the Quebec health care system

Marie Pascale Pomey, Raymond Hudon, Nicolas Van Schendel, Elisabeth Martin, Pierre Gerlier Forest

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 2005 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a landmark ruling in the debate on privatization of Quebec's health care system. The Quebec government subsequently made several decisions, such as lifting the ban on private insurance for some health services already offered in the public system. We interviewed 42 stakeholders who were involved in the decision process between 1999 and 2008 and analyzed their views. We identified three types of positions on privatization, based on two key factors raised in these encounters: (a) the ideological and political inertia of both civil society and the state and (b) the concerted action of stakeholders.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	324-336
Number of pages	13
Journal	Canadian Public Policy
Volume	42
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2015-056
State	Published - Sep 2016
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Chaoulli ruling
Health care
Privatization
Public policies
Stakeholders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sociology and Political Science
Public Administration

Access to Document

10.3138/cpp.2015-056

Cite this

@article{7bce57043c7442128fc75320aceb71fa,

title = "Stakeholder views on privatization of the Quebec health care system",

abstract = "In 2005 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a landmark ruling in the debate on privatization of Quebec's health care system. The Quebec government subsequently made several decisions, such as lifting the ban on private insurance for some health services already offered in the public system. We interviewed 42 stakeholders who were involved in the decision process between 1999 and 2008 and analyzed their views. We identified three types of positions on privatization, based on two key factors raised in these encounters: (a) the ideological and political inertia of both civil society and the state and (b) the concerted action of stakeholders.",

keywords = "Chaoulli ruling, Health care, Privatization, Public policies, Stakeholders",

author = "Pomey, {Marie Pascale} and Raymond Hudon and {Van Schendel}, Nicolas and Elisabeth Martin and Forest, {Pierre Gerlier}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright}Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de politiques, September / septembre 2016.",

year = "2016",

month = sep,

doi = "10.3138/cpp.2015-056",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "42",

pages = "324--336",

journal = "Canadian Public Policy/ Analyse de Politiques",

issn = "0317-0861",

publisher = "University of Toronto Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholder views on privatization of the Quebec health care system

AU - Pomey, Marie Pascale

AU - Hudon, Raymond

AU - Van Schendel, Nicolas

AU - Martin, Elisabeth

AU - Forest, Pierre Gerlier

N1 - Publisher Copyright: ©Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de politiques, September / septembre 2016.

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - In 2005 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a landmark ruling in the debate on privatization of Quebec's health care system. The Quebec government subsequently made several decisions, such as lifting the ban on private insurance for some health services already offered in the public system. We interviewed 42 stakeholders who were involved in the decision process between 1999 and 2008 and analyzed their views. We identified three types of positions on privatization, based on two key factors raised in these encounters: (a) the ideological and political inertia of both civil society and the state and (b) the concerted action of stakeholders.

AB - In 2005 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a landmark ruling in the debate on privatization of Quebec's health care system. The Quebec government subsequently made several decisions, such as lifting the ban on private insurance for some health services already offered in the public system. We interviewed 42 stakeholders who were involved in the decision process between 1999 and 2008 and analyzed their views. We identified three types of positions on privatization, based on two key factors raised in these encounters: (a) the ideological and political inertia of both civil society and the state and (b) the concerted action of stakeholders.

KW - Chaoulli ruling

KW - Health care

KW - Privatization

KW - Public policies

KW - Stakeholders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994908335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994908335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3138/cpp.2015-056

DO - 10.3138/cpp.2015-056

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84994908335

SN - 0317-0861

VL - 42

SP - 324

EP - 336

JO - Canadian Public Policy/ Analyse de Politiques

JF - Canadian Public Policy/ Analyse de Politiques

IS - 3

ER -

Stakeholder views on privatization of the Quebec health care system

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this