Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men

David S. Guzick, James W. Overstreet, Pam Factor-Litvak, Charlene K. Brazil, Steven T. Nakajima, Christos Coutifaris, Sandra Ann Carson, Pauline Cisneros, Michael P. Steinkampf, Joseph A. Hill, Dong Xu, Donna L. Vogel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

821 Scopus citations


Background Although semen analysis is routinely used to evaluate the male partner in infertile couples, sperm measurements that discriminate between fertile and infertile men are not well defined. Methods We evaluated two semen specimens from each of the male partners in 765 infertile couples and 696 fertile couples at nine sites. The female partners in the infertile couples had normal results on fertility evaluation. The sperm concentration and motility were determined at the sites; semen smears were stained at the sites and shipped to a central laboratory for an assessment of morphologic features of sperm with the use of strict criteria. We used classification-and-regression-tree analysis to estimate threshold values for subfertility and fertility with respect to the sperm concentration, motility, and morphology. We also used an analysis of receiver-operating-characteristic curves to assess the relative value of these sperm measurements in discriminating between fertile and infertile men. Results The subfertile ranges were a sperm concentration of less than 13.5x10 6 per milliliter, less than 32 percent of sperm with motility, and less than 9 percent with normal morphologic features. The fertile ranges were a concentration of more than 48.0x10 6 per milliliter, greater than 63 percent motility, and greater than 12 percent normal morphologic features. Values between these ranges indicated indeterminate fertility. There was extensive overlap between the fertile and the infertile men within both the subfertile and the fertile ranges for all three measurements. Although each of the sperm measurements helped to distinguish between fertile and infertile men, none was a powerful discriminator. The percentage of sperm with normal morphologic features had the greatest discriminatory power. Conclusions Threshold values for sperm concentration, motility, and morphology can be used to classify men as subfertile, of indeterminate fertility, or fertile. None of the measures, however, are diagnostic of infertility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1388-1393
Number of pages6
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Issue number19
StatePublished - Nov 8 2001
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this