Specialty Mediated 30-Day Complications in First Rib Resection for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Background: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) takes on heterogenous upper extremity manifestations depending on whether the artery, vein or brachial plexus is primarily compressed. As a result of these variable vascular and neurogenic symptoms, these patients present to surgeons of various training backgrounds for surgical decompression. Surgeon specialty is known to correlate with outcomes for numerous vascular procedures, but its role in TOS is unclear. In this work we examine the association of surgeon specialty with short-term outcomes following first rib resection (FRRS) for TOS. Methods: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, 3,070 patients were identified who underwent FRRS for TOS between 2006-2017. The primary outcomes of the study were 30-d complications, including postoperative hemorrhage requiring transfusion, wound complications, pneumothorax and deep venous thrombosis. Arterial, venous, and neurogenic TOS were distinguished with ICD-9 and 10 codes while patient characteristics, provider specialty, and postoperative outcomes were classified through a combination of standard National Surgical Quality Improvement Program variables and ICD data. Results: Most FRRS were performed by vascular surgeons (87.9%), general (6.9%) and thoracic surgeons (4.4%). The relative distribution of vascular TOS between the specialties was not significantly different, with non-vascular surgeons performing an equivalent amount of FRRS for arterial (1.1% versus 2.4%) and venous TOS (8.6% versus 9.1%, both P> 0.05). Patients who underwent FRRS with non-vascular surgeons experienced more frequent perioperative transfusions (3.2% versus 1.2%, P = 0.001) and wound infections (1.9% versus 0.8%, P= 0.04). On multivariable regression, patients undergoing FRRS for venous TOS were more likely to require blood transfusion (odds ratios:3.63, 95% CI 1.43-9.25). Patients operated on by surgeons whose specialty was not among the top three most common specialties performing FRRS had a 40% longer operative time (incidence rate ratios:1.42, 95% CI 1.15-1.74) as well as a significantly increased odds of requiring a transfusion (odds ratios:9.87, 95% CI 2.28-42.68). Conclusions: The significantly increased operative times and transfusion requirements associated with specialties who uncommonly perform FRRS suggest the role of surgeon experience and volume in this procedure may play more of a role than specialty training. These data also suggest that vascular TOS carries unique risks that should be kept in mind when performing FRRS.