TY - GEN
T1 - Speaking with a bite-block
T2 - 7th International Seminar on Speech Production, ISSP 2006
AU - Zandipour, Majid
AU - Perkell, Joseph
AU - Guenther, Frank
AU - Tiede, Mark
AU - Honda, Kiyoshi
AU - Murano, Emi
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Based on the assumption that the goals of phonemic speech movements are both auditory and somatosensory in nature, a biomechanical model of the vocal tract in conjunction with an adaptive controller inspired by the DIVA model of speech production (Guenther et al., 2006) were employed to investigate how the feedforward and feedback mechanisms operate in the planning for the production of the vowel [iy] with the presence of a bite-block and/or masking noise. Simulations of the vocal tract model corroborate the hypotheses predicted by the DIVA model, suggesting that: a) in the absence of auditory feedback, the subject used his learned feedforward motor command for producing a vowel-to-vowel sequence; b) in the presence of a bite-block and auditory feedback, the subject relied on the acoustic feedback mechanism during his productions; c) in the absence of auditory feedback and with a biteblock present, the subject relied on his feedforward motor plans initially, and then later on, incorporated corrective commands from the somatosensory feedback system into his productions.
AB - Based on the assumption that the goals of phonemic speech movements are both auditory and somatosensory in nature, a biomechanical model of the vocal tract in conjunction with an adaptive controller inspired by the DIVA model of speech production (Guenther et al., 2006) were employed to investigate how the feedforward and feedback mechanisms operate in the planning for the production of the vowel [iy] with the presence of a bite-block and/or masking noise. Simulations of the vocal tract model corroborate the hypotheses predicted by the DIVA model, suggesting that: a) in the absence of auditory feedback, the subject used his learned feedforward motor command for producing a vowel-to-vowel sequence; b) in the presence of a bite-block and auditory feedback, the subject relied on the acoustic feedback mechanism during his productions; c) in the absence of auditory feedback and with a biteblock present, the subject relied on his feedforward motor plans initially, and then later on, incorporated corrective commands from the somatosensory feedback system into his productions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907002993&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907002993&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84907002993
SN - 8599598023
SN - 9788599598023
T3 - ISSP 2006 - Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Speech Production
SP - 361
EP - 368
BT - ISSP 2006 - Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Speech Production
PB - CEFALA
Y2 - 13 December 2006 through 15 December 2006
ER -