Somatic symptoms of anxiety: Comparison of self-report and physiological measures

Daniel R. McLeod, Rudolf Hoehn-Saric, Robin L. Stefan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

The frequently reported absence of significant correlations between patient rating scales and physiological measures has led to the belief that patients cannot reliably perceive physiological changes that are experienced under conditions of stress. To determine whether or not this conclusion is justified for patients with clinical anxiety, self-reports and psychophysiological recordings were examined and compared in 20 patients suffering from generalized anxiety disorder. No systematic correlations were found between patient ratings and physiological measures of somatic symptomatology during periods of rest or psychological stress (Stroop Test). However, parallel directional changes in the two sets of measures were observed upon exposure to stress, indicating that patients could accurately report the direction, but not the degree, of changes in physical symptoms of anxiety. These results suggest that patient reports of physical symptoms such as sweating and rapid heart rate can be useful in clinical evaluation and research settings that do not require quantitative assessment of physiological activity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)301-310
Number of pages10
JournalBiological psychiatry
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1986

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biological Psychiatry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Somatic symptoms of anxiety: Comparison of self-report and physiological measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this