TY - JOUR
T1 - Sociodemographic Disparities in Access to Hospice and Palliative Care
T2 - An Integrative Review
AU - Nelson, Katie E.
AU - Wright, Rebecca
AU - Peeler, Anna
AU - Brockie, Teresa
AU - Davidson, Patricia M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Stella Seal, MLS, for assistance in developing the search strategy, and Sarah Szanton, PhD, ANP, FAAN, for insightful feedback throughout the preparation of this integrative review. The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Background: There is growing evidence of disparities in access to hospice and palliative care services to varying degrees by sociodemographic groups. Underlying factors contributing to access issues have received little systematic attention. Objective: To synthesize current literature on disparities in access to hospice and palliative care, highlight the range of sociodemographic groups affected by these inequities, characterize the domains of access addressed, and outline implications for research, policy, and clinical practice. Design: An integrative review comprised a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases, which was conducted from inception to March 2020 for studies outlining disparities in hospice and palliative care access in the United States. Data were analyzed using critical synthesis within the context of a health care accessibility conceptual framework. Included studies were appraised on methodological quality and quality of reporting. Results: Of the articles included, 80% employed non-experimental study designs. Study measures varied, but 70% of studies described differences in outcomes by race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status. Others revealed disparate access based on variables such as age, gender, and geographic location. Overall synthesis highlighted evidence of disparities spanning 5 domains of access: Approachability, Acceptability, Availability, Affordability, and Appropriateness; 60% of studies primarily emphasized Acceptability, Affordability, and Appropriateness. Conclusions: This integrative review highlights the need to consider various stakeholder perspectives and attitudes at the individual, provider, and system levels going forward, to target and address access issues spanning all domains.
AB - Background: There is growing evidence of disparities in access to hospice and palliative care services to varying degrees by sociodemographic groups. Underlying factors contributing to access issues have received little systematic attention. Objective: To synthesize current literature on disparities in access to hospice and palliative care, highlight the range of sociodemographic groups affected by these inequities, characterize the domains of access addressed, and outline implications for research, policy, and clinical practice. Design: An integrative review comprised a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases, which was conducted from inception to March 2020 for studies outlining disparities in hospice and palliative care access in the United States. Data were analyzed using critical synthesis within the context of a health care accessibility conceptual framework. Included studies were appraised on methodological quality and quality of reporting. Results: Of the articles included, 80% employed non-experimental study designs. Study measures varied, but 70% of studies described differences in outcomes by race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status. Others revealed disparate access based on variables such as age, gender, and geographic location. Overall synthesis highlighted evidence of disparities spanning 5 domains of access: Approachability, Acceptability, Availability, Affordability, and Appropriateness; 60% of studies primarily emphasized Acceptability, Affordability, and Appropriateness. Conclusions: This integrative review highlights the need to consider various stakeholder perspectives and attitudes at the individual, provider, and system levels going forward, to target and address access issues spanning all domains.
KW - health services accessibility
KW - healthcare disparities
KW - hospices
KW - palliative care
KW - review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099283455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099283455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1049909120985419
DO - 10.1177/1049909120985419
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33423532
AN - SCOPUS:85099283455
SN - 1049-9091
VL - 38
SP - 1378
EP - 1390
JO - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
JF - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
IS - 11
ER -