TY - JOUR
T1 - Social Risk Groups in Patients With Diabetes With Differing Eye Care Utilization and Vision Outcomes
AU - Cai, Cindy X.
AU - Han, Dingfen
AU - Tran, Diep
AU - Moreno, Jose Amezcua
AU - Zeger, Scott L.
AU - Crews, Deidra C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate whether latent class analysis on social determinants of health (SDoH) data can identify social risk groups that differ by adverse SDoH and vision outcomes in patients with diabetes. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of adults ≥18yearswithdiabeteswho completed a SDoH survey. Latent class analysis was used to cluster patients into social risk groups. The association of social risk group and severity of diabetic retinopathy, history of lapses in diabetic retinopathy care, and visual acuity was evaluated. Results: A total of 1006 participants were included. The three social risk groups differed by sociodemographic characteristics. The average age was 65, 60, and 54 in Groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Most (51%) patients in group 1 were non-Hispanic White, 66% in group 2 were non-Hispanic Black, and 80% in group 3 were Hispanic. Group 1 had the lowest burden of adverse SDoH per person (average 3.6), group 2 had 8.2, and group 3 had 10.5. In general, group 1 lacked diabetic retinopathy knowledge, group 2 had financial insecurity and difficulties with transportation, and group 3 had financial insecurity and did not have health insurance. Social risk group was associated with a history of lapses in diabetic retinopathy care, and presenting with worse vision. Conclusions and Translational Relevance: We identified distinct social risk groups among patients seeking care for diabetic retinopathy that differed by social needs, eye care utilization, and vision. Identifying these groups and their specific needs can help guide interventions to effectively address adverse SDoH and improve eye care utilization and vision outcomes among patients with diabetes.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate whether latent class analysis on social determinants of health (SDoH) data can identify social risk groups that differ by adverse SDoH and vision outcomes in patients with diabetes. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of adults ≥18yearswithdiabeteswho completed a SDoH survey. Latent class analysis was used to cluster patients into social risk groups. The association of social risk group and severity of diabetic retinopathy, history of lapses in diabetic retinopathy care, and visual acuity was evaluated. Results: A total of 1006 participants were included. The three social risk groups differed by sociodemographic characteristics. The average age was 65, 60, and 54 in Groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Most (51%) patients in group 1 were non-Hispanic White, 66% in group 2 were non-Hispanic Black, and 80% in group 3 were Hispanic. Group 1 had the lowest burden of adverse SDoH per person (average 3.6), group 2 had 8.2, and group 3 had 10.5. In general, group 1 lacked diabetic retinopathy knowledge, group 2 had financial insecurity and difficulties with transportation, and group 3 had financial insecurity and did not have health insurance. Social risk group was associated with a history of lapses in diabetic retinopathy care, and presenting with worse vision. Conclusions and Translational Relevance: We identified distinct social risk groups among patients seeking care for diabetic retinopathy that differed by social needs, eye care utilization, and vision. Identifying these groups and their specific needs can help guide interventions to effectively address adverse SDoH and improve eye care utilization and vision outcomes among patients with diabetes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188045827&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85188045827&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1167/tvst.13.3.13
DO - 10.1167/tvst.13.3.13
M3 - Article
C2 - 38497518
AN - SCOPUS:85188045827
SN - 2164-2591
VL - 13
JO - Translational Vision Science and Technology
JF - Translational Vision Science and Technology
IS - 3
M1 - 13
ER -