TY - JOUR
T1 - Skeletal Applications for Flat-Panel versus Storage-Phosphor Radiography
T2 - Effect of Exposure on Detection of Low-Contrast Details
AU - Uffmann, Martin
AU - Schaefer-Prokop, Cornelia
AU - Neitzel, Ulrich
AU - Weber, Michael
AU - Herold, Christian J.
AU - Prokop, Mathias
PY - 2004/5/1
Y1 - 2004/5/1
N2 - PURPOSE: To compare exposure requirements for similar detection performance with flat-panel detectors and the most recent generation of storage-phosphor plates in the simulated scatter of typical skeletal radiographic examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A contrast-detail test object was covered with varying thicknesses of acrylic to simulate skeletal exposure conditions in the wrist, knee, and pelvis. Three series were obtained with increasing thicknesses of a simulated soft-tissue layer (5, 10, and 20 cm) and increasing tube voltage (50, 70, and 90 kVp). A fourth series was obtained with exposure conditions adapted to the phantom instructions (75 kVp). Images were acquired with a flat-panel detector (cesium iodide scintillator) and storage-phosphor plates at five exposure levels (speed class range, 100-1,600). Five readers evaluated 84 images to determine the threshold contrast of 12 lesion diameters (range, 0.25-11.1 mm). Statistical significance of differences between the two digital systems was assessed with two-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: A linear relationship was found between the number of detected lesions and the logarithm of exposure (R2 > 0.98 for all series). On average, the flat-panel system required 45% less exposure than did the phosphor plates when 20-cm-thick acrylic was superimposed on the test object. Differences in exposure requirements were smaller with decreasing thicknesses of simulated soft-tissue layers and lower tube voltages (39% at 10 cm and 70 kVp, and 17% at 5 cm and 50 kVp). All differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Flat-panel radiography provides improved contrast detectability and a potential for exposure reduction compared with those with storage-phosphor radiography. The best performance was achieved with conditions comparable to those for radiography of the trunk and lowest for conditions that simulate radiography of the extremities.
AB - PURPOSE: To compare exposure requirements for similar detection performance with flat-panel detectors and the most recent generation of storage-phosphor plates in the simulated scatter of typical skeletal radiographic examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A contrast-detail test object was covered with varying thicknesses of acrylic to simulate skeletal exposure conditions in the wrist, knee, and pelvis. Three series were obtained with increasing thicknesses of a simulated soft-tissue layer (5, 10, and 20 cm) and increasing tube voltage (50, 70, and 90 kVp). A fourth series was obtained with exposure conditions adapted to the phantom instructions (75 kVp). Images were acquired with a flat-panel detector (cesium iodide scintillator) and storage-phosphor plates at five exposure levels (speed class range, 100-1,600). Five readers evaluated 84 images to determine the threshold contrast of 12 lesion diameters (range, 0.25-11.1 mm). Statistical significance of differences between the two digital systems was assessed with two-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: A linear relationship was found between the number of detected lesions and the logarithm of exposure (R2 > 0.98 for all series). On average, the flat-panel system required 45% less exposure than did the phosphor plates when 20-cm-thick acrylic was superimposed on the test object. Differences in exposure requirements were smaller with decreasing thicknesses of simulated soft-tissue layers and lower tube voltages (39% at 10 cm and 70 kVp, and 17% at 5 cm and 50 kVp). All differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Flat-panel radiography provides improved contrast detectability and a potential for exposure reduction compared with those with storage-phosphor radiography. The best performance was achieved with conditions comparable to those for radiography of the trunk and lowest for conditions that simulate radiography of the extremities.
KW - Experimental study
KW - Radiations, exposure to patients and personnel
KW - Radiography, comparative studies
KW - Radiography, flat panel
KW - Radiography, storage phosphor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2142702254&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2142702254&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2312021662
DO - 10.1148/radiol.2312021662
M3 - Article
C2 - 15128995
AN - SCOPUS:2142702254
SN - 0033-8419
VL - 231
SP - 506
EP - 514
JO - RADIOLOGY
JF - RADIOLOGY
IS - 2
ER -