Single-Use versus Reusable Endoscopes for Percutaneous Biliary Endoscopy with Lithotripsy: Technical Metrics, Clinical Outcomes, and Cost Comparison

Purpose: To compare procedure and fluoroscopy time, technical and clinical success, and costs between single-use and reusable endoscopes in patients undergoing percutaneous biliary endoscopy (PBE) with lithotripsy. Material and Methods: Thirty-four patients (67 procedures) were retrospectively included in the study. The patients were treated with PBE for gallstone removal from October 24, 2014, to February 12, 2020, using reusable (28 procedures) or single-use (39 procedures) endoscopes. The procedure time, fluoroscopy time, technical success rate (accessing the biliary system and locating the gallstone), clinical success rate (at least partial gallstone removal), complication rate, and cost of use were compared between the procedures. Results: The mean (± standard deviation) procedure time was not significantly different between single-use (136 minutes ± 45) and reusable endoscopes (136 minutes ± 51) (P =.47). The mean fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter for single-use endoscopes (11 minutes ± 8.4) than for reusable endoscopes (18 minutes ± 12) (P =.01). When comparing single-use versus reusable endoscopes, the technical success (95% [n = 37] vs 93% [n = 26]) and the clinical success (90% [n = 35] vs 75% [n = 21]) rates were not significantly different (both, P >.05). Only 1 complication was noted in the reusable endoscope group (P =.42). The cost per case was lower for single-use ($1,500) than for reusable ($3,987) endoscope procedures, primarily due to differences in capital costs and repair costs. Conclusions: Single-use endoscopes offer the potential for lower patient radiation exposure and lower cost per case, which may reduce the financial barriers to offering PBE in interventional radiology practices. The clinical and technical success rates did not differ by endoscope type.