TY - JOUR
T1 - Simple swallowing provocation test has limited applicability as a screening tool for detecting aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration
AU - Kagaya, Hitoshi
AU - Okada, Sumiko
AU - Saitoh, Eiichi
AU - Baba, Mikoto
AU - Yokoyama, Michio
AU - Takahashi, Hitomi
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - A number of tests for evaluating dysphagia without using videofluoroscopic examination of swallowing (VF) or videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VE)have been developed. The simple swallowing provocation test (SSPT) is unique because it is performed while in a supine position and does not require the patient's cooperation. However, whether the SSPT detects aspiration or penetration correctly is unclear because its validity determined by VF or VE has not been evaluated. Therefore, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of SSPT followed by VF in 45 patients. The sensitivities of the first-step and the second-step SSPT for the detection of aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration were 72-75% and 13-17%, respectively; the specificities of the first-step and the second-step SSPT were 38-44% and 80-89%, respectively; and the predictive accuracies of the first-step and the second-step SSPT were 58-67% and 31-49%, respectively. These data suggest that SSPT has limited applicability as a screening tool for aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration because of its low sensitivity. This test may be useful for patients who cannot undergo other tests due to cognitive and/ or linguistic dysfunction.
AB - A number of tests for evaluating dysphagia without using videofluoroscopic examination of swallowing (VF) or videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VE)have been developed. The simple swallowing provocation test (SSPT) is unique because it is performed while in a supine position and does not require the patient's cooperation. However, whether the SSPT detects aspiration or penetration correctly is unclear because its validity determined by VF or VE has not been evaluated. Therefore, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of SSPT followed by VF in 45 patients. The sensitivities of the first-step and the second-step SSPT for the detection of aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration were 72-75% and 13-17%, respectively; the specificities of the first-step and the second-step SSPT were 38-44% and 80-89%, respectively; and the predictive accuracies of the first-step and the second-step SSPT were 58-67% and 31-49%, respectively. These data suggest that SSPT has limited applicability as a screening tool for aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration because of its low sensitivity. This test may be useful for patients who cannot undergo other tests due to cognitive and/ or linguistic dysfunction.
KW - Aspiration
KW - Deglutition
KW - Deglutition disorders
KW - Penetration
KW - Screening test
KW - Simple swallowing provocation test
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953292087&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953292087&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00455-009-9222-3
DO - 10.1007/s00455-009-9222-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 19626367
AN - SCOPUS:77953292087
SN - 0179-051X
VL - 25
SP - 6
EP - 10
JO - Dysphagia
JF - Dysphagia
IS - 1
ER -