Should thrombolysis or primary angioplasty be the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction?

R. A. Lange; L. D. Hillis; C. L. Grines

doi:10.1056/NEJM199610243351710

Should thrombolysis or primary angioplasty be the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction?

R. A. Lange
, L. D. Hillis
, C. L. Grines

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1311-1317
Number of pages	7
Journal	New England Journal of Medicine
Volume	335
Issue number	17
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199610243351710
State	Published - 1996
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Medicine

Access to Document

10.1056/NEJM199610243351710

Cite this

@article{1a32939d97b34afe8aeedc316a168512,

title = "Should thrombolysis or primary angioplasty be the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction?",

author = "Lange, \{R. A.\} and Hillis, \{L. D.\} and Grines, \{C. L.\}",

year = "1996",

doi = "10.1056/NEJM199610243351710",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "335",

pages = "1311--1317",

journal = "New England Journal of Medicine",

issn = "0028-4793",