Abstract
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-associated aortopathy is a complex phenomenon, and the current lack of univocal interpretation of its causes and treatment can be ascribed to the multiform nature of its clinical presentation. Although there is strong bias in the literature favoring more aggressive treatment of ascending aortic dilatation in patients with BAV, evidence supporting this opinion is lacking. This review discusses some of the relevant issues relating to causation to facilitate a better analysis of the current recommendations used to guide surgical management, and concludes that treatment should be tailored by individual valvular pathology, clinical phenotype, and relevant comorbidities, using well-documented evidence-based clinical size criteria.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 299-314 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Cardiology clinics |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - May 2010 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine