Sexual decision making of Ugandan young adults: findings from national online discussions

Michele L. Ybarra, Jennifer Paola Villalobos, Novatus Nyemara, Sheana S. Bull

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Fifty-one 18–22-year-old Ugandans took part in asynchronous online discussions about sexual decision-making. To increase generalizability and variability of experience, youth were recruited across the country using social media advertising. Participants were stratified into 8 groups by sex and sexual experience (e.g., women who had not had sex). Participants were asked questions such as, “What role do you think [men/women] play in deciding when a couple is going to play sex?” Several themes emerged. Both young men and women articulated social pressures to be abstinent, particularly to avoid STIs and pregnancy moreso than saving oneself for marriage. That said, women noted pressures to be seen as “pure”. There also were pressures to have sex: Men were expected to have sex to demonstrate their virility. Women were expected to have sex if they accepted gifts or other commodities from their partners. It seemed that the specter of HIV and other STIs, as well as unwanted pregnancy, served to mitigate these expectations however, resulting in self-efficacy to use condoms among both men and women. Nonetheless, both men and women acknowledged that it could be hard for women to negotiate condoms. Implications for HIV prevention are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-301
Number of pages6
JournalAIDS Care - Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • HIV prevention
  • Uganda
  • Young adults
  • qualitative data
  • sexual decision-making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sexual decision making of Ugandan young adults: findings from national online discussions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this