TY - JOUR
T1 - Setting standards at the forefront of delivery system reform
T2 - aligning care coordination quality measures for multiple chronic conditions.
AU - DuGoff, Eva H.
AU - Dy, Sydney
AU - Giovannetti, Erin
AU - Leff, Bruce
AU - Boyd, Cynthia M.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - The primary study objective is to assess how three major health reform care coordination initiatives (Accountable Care Organizations, Independence at Home, and Community-Based Care Transitions) measure concepts critical to care coordination for people with multiple chronic conditions. We find that there are major differences in quality measurement across these three large and politically important programs. Quality measures currently used or proposed for these new health reform-related programs addressing care coordination primarily capture continuity of care. Other key areas of care coordination, such as care transitions, patient-centeredness, and cross-cutting care across multiple conditions are infrequently addressed. The lack of a comprehensive and consistent measure set for care coordination will pose challenges for healthcare providers and policy makers who seek, respectively, to provide and reward well-coordinated care. In addition, this heterogeneity in measuring care coordination quality will generate new information, but will inhibit comparisons between these care coordination programs.
AB - The primary study objective is to assess how three major health reform care coordination initiatives (Accountable Care Organizations, Independence at Home, and Community-Based Care Transitions) measure concepts critical to care coordination for people with multiple chronic conditions. We find that there are major differences in quality measurement across these three large and politically important programs. Quality measures currently used or proposed for these new health reform-related programs addressing care coordination primarily capture continuity of care. Other key areas of care coordination, such as care transitions, patient-centeredness, and cross-cutting care across multiple conditions are infrequently addressed. The lack of a comprehensive and consistent measure set for care coordination will pose challenges for healthcare providers and policy makers who seek, respectively, to provide and reward well-coordinated care. In addition, this heterogeneity in measuring care coordination quality will generate new information, but will inhibit comparisons between these care coordination programs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901881378&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901881378&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jhq.12029
DO - 10.1111/jhq.12029
M3 - Article
C2 - 24004040
AN - SCOPUS:84901881378
SN - 1062-2551
VL - 35
SP - 58
EP - 69
JO - Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
JF - Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
IS - 5
ER -