TY - JOUR
T1 - Selective parathyroid venous sampling in reoperative parathyroid surgery
T2 - A key localization tool when noninvasive tests are unrevealing
AU - Zolin, Samuel J.
AU - Crawford, Kate
AU - Rudin, Anatoliy V.
AU - Harsono, Hasly
AU - Krishnamurthy, Vikram D.
AU - Jin, Judy
AU - Berber, Eren
AU - Siperstein, Allan
AU - Shin, Joyce J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Background: Preoperative localization studies are essential for parathyroid re-exploration. When noninvasive studies do not regionalize the abnormal parathyroid gland, selective parathyroid venous sampling may be employed. We studied the utility of parathyroid venous sampling in reoperative parathyroid surgery and the factors that may affect parathyroid venous sampling results. Methods: Patients with hyperparathyroidism and previous cervical surgery undergoing evaluation for reoperative parathyroidectomy over a 20-year period were identified. Patients with indeterminate or negative noninvasive studies underwent parathyroid venous sampling. Parathyroid hormone values were mapped with a ≥2-fold increase above peripheral signifying positive parathyroid venous sampling. These results were correlated with reoperative findings. Results: Parathyroid venous sampling was positive in 113 of 140 (81%). Re-exploration occurred in 75 (66%). Parathyroid venous sampling correctly detected the region of abnormal glands in 58 (77%). With 1 gradient, 1 abnormal gland was found in 81%. With multiple gradients, 1 abnormal gland was found in 78%, most often at the site with the largest gradient. Eighty percent of patients who underwent reoperative parathyroidectomy were biochemically cured. Conclusion: Parathyroid venous sampling can guide parathyroid re-exploration when noninvasive localizing studies are indeterminate. Expectation of 1 versus multiple remaining glands was key in interpreting the results.
AB - Background: Preoperative localization studies are essential for parathyroid re-exploration. When noninvasive studies do not regionalize the abnormal parathyroid gland, selective parathyroid venous sampling may be employed. We studied the utility of parathyroid venous sampling in reoperative parathyroid surgery and the factors that may affect parathyroid venous sampling results. Methods: Patients with hyperparathyroidism and previous cervical surgery undergoing evaluation for reoperative parathyroidectomy over a 20-year period were identified. Patients with indeterminate or negative noninvasive studies underwent parathyroid venous sampling. Parathyroid hormone values were mapped with a ≥2-fold increase above peripheral signifying positive parathyroid venous sampling. These results were correlated with reoperative findings. Results: Parathyroid venous sampling was positive in 113 of 140 (81%). Re-exploration occurred in 75 (66%). Parathyroid venous sampling correctly detected the region of abnormal glands in 58 (77%). With 1 gradient, 1 abnormal gland was found in 81%. With multiple gradients, 1 abnormal gland was found in 78%, most often at the site with the largest gradient. Eighty percent of patients who underwent reoperative parathyroidectomy were biochemically cured. Conclusion: Parathyroid venous sampling can guide parathyroid re-exploration when noninvasive localizing studies are indeterminate. Expectation of 1 versus multiple remaining glands was key in interpreting the results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097380183&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097380183&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2020.05.014
DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2020.05.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 32651054
AN - SCOPUS:85097380183
SN - 0039-6060
VL - 169
SP - 126
EP - 132
JO - Surgery (United States)
JF - Surgery (United States)
IS - 1
ER -