TY - JOUR
T1 - Securely sharing DSMB reports to speed decision making from multiple, concurrent, independent studies of similar treatments in COVID-19
AU - Executive Committee for the Coordinated Approach for Emergency Studies
AU - Dilts, Natalie A.
AU - Harrell, Frank E.
AU - Lindsell, Christopher J.
AU - Nwosu, Samuel
AU - Stewart, Thomas G.
AU - Shotwell, Matthew S.
AU - Pulley, Jill M.
AU - Edwards, Terri L.
AU - Serdoz, Emily Sheffer
AU - Benhoff, Katelyn
AU - Bernard, Gordon R.
AU - Atkinson, Jane C.
AU - Benjamin, Daniel K.
AU - Bernard, Gordon R.
AU - Bierer, Barbara E.
AU - Bozzette, Samuel A.
AU - Cohen, Theodora
AU - Ford, Daniel E.
AU - Goldenberg, Neil A.
AU - Hanley, Daniel F.
AU - Harrell, Frank E.
AU - Lindsell, Christopher J.
AU - Ogburn, Elizabeth L.
AU - Scharfstein, Daniel
AU - Selker, Harry P.
AU - Smith, Phillip Brian
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by award number U24TR001579 from the Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This work is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s).
PY - 2022/4/11
Y1 - 2022/4/11
N2 - Introduction: As clinical trials were rapidly initiated in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Data and Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs) faced unique challenges overseeing trials of therapies never tested in a disease not yet characterized. Traditionally, individual DSMBs do not interact or have the benefit of seeing data from other accruing trials for an aggregated analysis to meaningfully interpret safety signals of similar therapeutics. In response, we developed a compliant DSMB Coordination (DSMBc) framework to allow the DSMB from one study investigating the use of SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma to treat COVID-19 to review data from similar ongoing studies for the purpose of safety monitoring. Methods: The DSMBc process included engagement of DSMB chairs and board members, execution of contractual agreements, secure data acquisition, generation of harmonized reports utilizing statistical graphics, and secure report sharing with DSMB members. Detailed process maps, a secure portal for managing DSMB reports, and templates for data sharing and confidentiality agreements were developed. Results: Four trials participated. Data from one trial were successfully harmonized with that of an ongoing trial. Harmonized reports allowing for visualization and drill down into the data were presented to the ongoing trial's DSMB. While DSMB deliberations are confidential, the Chair confirmed successful review of the harmonized report. Conclusion: It is feasible to coordinate DSMB reviews of multiple independent studies of a similar therapeutic in similar patient cohorts. The materials presented mitigate challenges to DSMBc and will help expand these initiatives so DSMBs may make more informed decisions with all available information.
AB - Introduction: As clinical trials were rapidly initiated in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Data and Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs) faced unique challenges overseeing trials of therapies never tested in a disease not yet characterized. Traditionally, individual DSMBs do not interact or have the benefit of seeing data from other accruing trials for an aggregated analysis to meaningfully interpret safety signals of similar therapeutics. In response, we developed a compliant DSMB Coordination (DSMBc) framework to allow the DSMB from one study investigating the use of SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma to treat COVID-19 to review data from similar ongoing studies for the purpose of safety monitoring. Methods: The DSMBc process included engagement of DSMB chairs and board members, execution of contractual agreements, secure data acquisition, generation of harmonized reports utilizing statistical graphics, and secure report sharing with DSMB members. Detailed process maps, a secure portal for managing DSMB reports, and templates for data sharing and confidentiality agreements were developed. Results: Four trials participated. Data from one trial were successfully harmonized with that of an ongoing trial. Harmonized reports allowing for visualization and drill down into the data were presented to the ongoing trial's DSMB. While DSMB deliberations are confidential, the Chair confirmed successful review of the harmonized report. Conclusion: It is feasible to coordinate DSMB reviews of multiple independent studies of a similar therapeutic in similar patient cohorts. The materials presented mitigate challenges to DSMBc and will help expand these initiatives so DSMBs may make more informed decisions with all available information.
KW - Data and Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs)
KW - data harmonization
KW - data sharing/pooling
KW - safety monitoring
KW - trial monitoring
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128708845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128708845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/cts.2022.387
DO - 10.1017/cts.2022.387
M3 - Article
C2 - 35656334
AN - SCOPUS:85128708845
SN - 2059-8661
VL - 6
JO - Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
JF - Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
IS - 1
M1 - e49
ER -