TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of nucleoside/nucleotide analogues and low-dose hepatitis B immune globulin in prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence among cadaveric liver transplant recipients
AU - Ajayi, Tokunbo
AU - Luu, Harry
AU - Saberi, Behnam
AU - Hamilton, James P.
AU - Konduk, Bugra Tolga
AU - Özseker, Burak
AU - Khalloufi, Kawtar Al
AU - Pustavoitau, Aliaksei
AU - Philosophe, Benjamin
AU - Cameron, Andrew M.
AU - Gürakar, Ahmet
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2018 by The Turkish Society of Gastroenterology.
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Background/Aims: Hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) positivity of the donor or the recipient may pose a risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation following liver transplantation (LT). We retrospectively investigated patient survival and reactivation among recipients who were given low-dose Hepatitis B Immune Globulin (HBIG) plus antiviral agent (AV) versus AV only. Materials and Methods: Records of cadaveric LT recipients, between 2013 and 2016, with positive Hepatitis B surface Antigen (HBsAg) and/or HBcAb and recipients who had received LT from HBcAb-positive donors were reviewed. Patient characteristics and clinical data were extracted. Donor variables were retrieved from the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. HBIG (1560 IU/mL) Intravenous (IV) was intraoperatively administered with three daily doses. Entecavir 1 mg daily was also given. STATA was used for statistical analysis. Results: There were 53 recipients; 39 (73.6%) were male with a median age of 59 y. HCV was the major indication in 30 (55.6%) patients. There were 28 recipients (52.8%) who received HBIG plus AV and 25 (47.2%) received AV only. The Model of End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score between the groups were similar. Survival rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 100% (n=53), 93.2% (n=44), and 100.0% (n=26), respectively. There was no reactivation; two recipients in the AV group and one in the HBIG plus AV group died within 12 months. Conclusion: This study supports the use of low-dose HBIG and AV for post-LT prophylaxis to be as effective as conventionally used high-dose HBIG (9600 IU) plus AV. Future prospective larger studies are warranted to examine the potential benefits of using AV alone without HBIG.
AB - Background/Aims: Hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) positivity of the donor or the recipient may pose a risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation following liver transplantation (LT). We retrospectively investigated patient survival and reactivation among recipients who were given low-dose Hepatitis B Immune Globulin (HBIG) plus antiviral agent (AV) versus AV only. Materials and Methods: Records of cadaveric LT recipients, between 2013 and 2016, with positive Hepatitis B surface Antigen (HBsAg) and/or HBcAb and recipients who had received LT from HBcAb-positive donors were reviewed. Patient characteristics and clinical data were extracted. Donor variables were retrieved from the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. HBIG (1560 IU/mL) Intravenous (IV) was intraoperatively administered with three daily doses. Entecavir 1 mg daily was also given. STATA was used for statistical analysis. Results: There were 53 recipients; 39 (73.6%) were male with a median age of 59 y. HCV was the major indication in 30 (55.6%) patients. There were 28 recipients (52.8%) who received HBIG plus AV and 25 (47.2%) received AV only. The Model of End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score between the groups were similar. Survival rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 100% (n=53), 93.2% (n=44), and 100.0% (n=26), respectively. There was no reactivation; two recipients in the AV group and one in the HBIG plus AV group died within 12 months. Conclusion: This study supports the use of low-dose HBIG and AV for post-LT prophylaxis to be as effective as conventionally used high-dose HBIG (9600 IU) plus AV. Future prospective larger studies are warranted to examine the potential benefits of using AV alone without HBIG.
KW - Hepatitis B
KW - Liver transplant
KW - Prophylaxis
KW - Recurrence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053335494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053335494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5152/tjg.2018.17595
DO - 10.5152/tjg.2018.17595
M3 - Article
C2 - 29391309
AN - SCOPUS:85053335494
SN - 1300-4948
VL - 29
SP - 61
EP - 66
JO - Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 1
ER -