TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991-2001
AU - Baker, Sharyn D.
AU - Verweij, Jaap
AU - Rowinsky, Eric K.
AU - Donehower, Ross C.
AU - Schellens, Jan H.M.
AU - Grochow, Louise Barnett
AU - Sparreboom, Alex
PY - 2002/12/18
Y1 - 2002/12/18
N2 - The prescribed dose of anticancer agents is most commonly calculated using body surface area as the only independent variable, and it has been shown that this approach still results in large interpatient variability in drug exposure. Here, we retrospectively assessed the pharmacokinetics; of 33 investigational agents tested in phase I trials from 1991 through 2001, as a function of body surface area in 1650 adult cancer patients. Twelve of the drugs were administered orally, 19 were administered intravenously, and two were administered by both routes. Body surface area-based dosing was statistically significantly associated with a reduction in interpatient variability in drug clearance for only five of the 33 agents: docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil/eniluracil, paclitaxel, temozolomide, and troxacitabine. These results do not support the use of body surface area in dose calculations and suggest that alternate dosing strategies should be evaluated. We conclude that body surface area should not be used to determine starting doses of investigational agents in future phase I studies.
AB - The prescribed dose of anticancer agents is most commonly calculated using body surface area as the only independent variable, and it has been shown that this approach still results in large interpatient variability in drug exposure. Here, we retrospectively assessed the pharmacokinetics; of 33 investigational agents tested in phase I trials from 1991 through 2001, as a function of body surface area in 1650 adult cancer patients. Twelve of the drugs were administered orally, 19 were administered intravenously, and two were administered by both routes. Body surface area-based dosing was statistically significantly associated with a reduction in interpatient variability in drug clearance for only five of the 33 agents: docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil/eniluracil, paclitaxel, temozolomide, and troxacitabine. These results do not support the use of body surface area in dose calculations and suggest that alternate dosing strategies should be evaluated. We conclude that body surface area should not be used to determine starting doses of investigational agents in future phase I studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037132703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037132703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jnci/94.24.1883
DO - 10.1093/jnci/94.24.1883
M3 - Review article
C2 - 12488482
AN - SCOPUS:0037132703
SN - 0027-8874
VL - 94
SP - 1883
EP - 1888
JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
IS - 24
ER -