TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk of anaphylaxis in cluster vs standard subcutaneous multiallergen immunotherapy
AU - Chen, Jonathan H.
AU - Orden, Tony
AU - Wang, Jiangxia
AU - Sowho, Mudiaga
AU - Tversky, Jody
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Background: Cluster schedules for subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (AIT) require significantly fewer injections, but there have been conflicting reports regarding the risk of systemic reactions (SR). Objective: To compare the incidence of SRs during the build-up stages of multiallergen standard vs cluster immunotherapy. Methods: Data on SRs were collected prospectively from 91 urban adult patients who underwent either standard or cluster AIT at the Johns Hopkins Allergy and Asthma Center from 2014 to 2022. The SRs were recorded during the build-up phase and compared for both protocols using Pearson's χ2, Fisher exact test, and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: Overall, SR rates were 21% for patients in the standard schedule and 37% for patients in the cluster immunotherapy schedule, which was not statistically different (P = .08). However, the SR rate for each injection was 0.69% per injection in the standard protocol and 2.29% per injection in the cluster schedule (incident rate ratio = 3.3). All SRs (100%) in both groups occurred in the second half of the build-up phase. Multivariate regression revealed that the target prescription protein nitrogen units and the number of allergens in the treatment vial did not influence SR rates (odds ratio = 1.00 and 1.06, respectively). Conclusion: The overall incidence of SR was not statistically different for cluster and standard AIT protocols. However, because cluster patients received approximately half the number of injections, the risk for SR per individual injection is more than 3-fold higher than that of standard immunotherapy.
AB - Background: Cluster schedules for subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (AIT) require significantly fewer injections, but there have been conflicting reports regarding the risk of systemic reactions (SR). Objective: To compare the incidence of SRs during the build-up stages of multiallergen standard vs cluster immunotherapy. Methods: Data on SRs were collected prospectively from 91 urban adult patients who underwent either standard or cluster AIT at the Johns Hopkins Allergy and Asthma Center from 2014 to 2022. The SRs were recorded during the build-up phase and compared for both protocols using Pearson's χ2, Fisher exact test, and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: Overall, SR rates were 21% for patients in the standard schedule and 37% for patients in the cluster immunotherapy schedule, which was not statistically different (P = .08). However, the SR rate for each injection was 0.69% per injection in the standard protocol and 2.29% per injection in the cluster schedule (incident rate ratio = 3.3). All SRs (100%) in both groups occurred in the second half of the build-up phase. Multivariate regression revealed that the target prescription protein nitrogen units and the number of allergens in the treatment vial did not influence SR rates (odds ratio = 1.00 and 1.06, respectively). Conclusion: The overall incidence of SR was not statistically different for cluster and standard AIT protocols. However, because cluster patients received approximately half the number of injections, the risk for SR per individual injection is more than 3-fold higher than that of standard immunotherapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146454234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146454234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.anai.2022.12.009
DO - 10.1016/j.anai.2022.12.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 36521783
AN - SCOPUS:85146454234
SN - 1081-1206
VL - 130
SP - 622
EP - 627
JO - Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
JF - Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
IS - 5
ER -