TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk Factors for Infection at the Operative Site after Abdominal or Vaginal Hysterectomy
AU - Shapiro, Mervyn
AU - Muñoz, Alvaro
AU - Tager, Ira B.
AU - Schoenbaum, Stephen C.
AU - Polk, B. Frank
PY - 1982/12/30
Y1 - 1982/12/30
N2 - We studied risk factors for postoperative infections at the operative site after hysterectomies. Data were collected prospectively on all women undergoing vaginal hysterectomies (323 patients) or abdominal hysterectomies (1125 patients) at the Boston Hospital for Women between February 1976 and April 1978. Logistic-regression analysis indicated that factors significantly associated (P<0.05) with a higher risk of infection at the operative site were increased duration of operation, lack of antibiotic prophylaxis, younger age, being a clinic patient, and an abdominai approach. After these variables were accounted for, the variables of obesity, preoperative functional and anatomical diagnoses, postoperative anatomical and pathological diagnoses, estimated blood loss, menopausal status, and operation by a specific surgeon did not add predictive power. An increasing duration of operation was associated with a decreasing effect of antibiotic prophylaxis, the preventive fraction of which diminished from 80 per cent at one hour to an unmeasurable effect at 3.3 hours. (N Engl J Med. 1982; 307:1661–6.), Infection at the operative site is common after hysterectomy; the result may be a prolonged hospital stay, increased use of antibiotics, and rehospitalization.1,2 Although placebo-controlled clinical trials have shown that short-term, perioperative, prophylactic antibiotic administration decreases infection rates, the reported protective effects of prophylaxis have varied among studies1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 and between vaginal and abdominal approaches.2,7,9,11 Factors that account for these observed differences and influence the risk of infection after hysterectomy are not well understood. We tried to determine which factors were associated with postoperative infection at the operative site and to investigate the reasons for failure of perioperative prophylaxis. Methods Between.
AB - We studied risk factors for postoperative infections at the operative site after hysterectomies. Data were collected prospectively on all women undergoing vaginal hysterectomies (323 patients) or abdominal hysterectomies (1125 patients) at the Boston Hospital for Women between February 1976 and April 1978. Logistic-regression analysis indicated that factors significantly associated (P<0.05) with a higher risk of infection at the operative site were increased duration of operation, lack of antibiotic prophylaxis, younger age, being a clinic patient, and an abdominai approach. After these variables were accounted for, the variables of obesity, preoperative functional and anatomical diagnoses, postoperative anatomical and pathological diagnoses, estimated blood loss, menopausal status, and operation by a specific surgeon did not add predictive power. An increasing duration of operation was associated with a decreasing effect of antibiotic prophylaxis, the preventive fraction of which diminished from 80 per cent at one hour to an unmeasurable effect at 3.3 hours. (N Engl J Med. 1982; 307:1661–6.), Infection at the operative site is common after hysterectomy; the result may be a prolonged hospital stay, increased use of antibiotics, and rehospitalization.1,2 Although placebo-controlled clinical trials have shown that short-term, perioperative, prophylactic antibiotic administration decreases infection rates, the reported protective effects of prophylaxis have varied among studies1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 and between vaginal and abdominal approaches.2,7,9,11 Factors that account for these observed differences and influence the risk of infection after hysterectomy are not well understood. We tried to determine which factors were associated with postoperative infection at the operative site and to investigate the reasons for failure of perioperative prophylaxis. Methods Between.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020420530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020420530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJM198212303072701
DO - 10.1056/NEJM198212303072701
M3 - Article
C2 - 6755254
AN - SCOPUS:0020420530
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 307
SP - 1661
EP - 1666
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 27
ER -