TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk factors for breast cancer subtypes by race and ethnicity
T2 - a scoping review
AU - Hurson, Amber N.
AU - Ahearn, Thomas U.
AU - Koka, Hela
AU - Jenkins, Brittany D.
AU - Harris, Alexandra R.
AU - Roberts, Sylvia
AU - Fan, Sharon
AU - Franklin, Jamirra
AU - Butera, Gisela
AU - Keeman, Renske
AU - Jung, Audrey Y.
AU - Middha, Pooja
AU - Gierach, Gretchen L.
AU - Yang, Xiaohong R.
AU - Chang-Claude, Jenny
AU - Tamimi, Rulla M.
AU - Troester, Melissa A.
AU - Bandera, Elisa V.
AU - Abubakar, Mustapha
AU - Schmidt, Marjanka K.
AU - Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/12/1
Y1 - 2024/12/1
N2 - Background: Breast cancer consists of distinct molecular subtypes. Studies have reported differences in risk factor associations with breast cancer subtypes, especially by tumor estrogen receptor (ER) status, but their consistency across racial and ethnic populations has not been comprehensively evaluated. Methods: We conducted a qualitative, scoping literature review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis, extension for Scoping Reviews to investigate consistencies in associations between 18 breast cancer risk factors (reproductive, anthropometric, lifestyle, and medical history) and risk of ER-defined subtypes in women who self-identify as Asian, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latina, or White. We reviewed publications between January 1, 1990 and July 1, 2022. Etiologic heterogeneity evidence (convincing, suggestive, none, or inconclusive) was determined by expert consensus. Results: Publications per risk factor ranged from 14 (benign breast disease history) to 66 (parity). Publications were most abundant for White women, followed by Asian, Black or African American, and Hispanic or Latina women. Etiologic heterogeneity evidence was strongest for parity, followed by age at first birth, postmenopausal body mass index, oral contraceptive use, and estrogen-only and combined menopausal hormone therapy. Evidence was limited for other risk factors. Findings were consistent across racial and ethnic groups, although the strength of evidence varied. Conclusion: The literature supports etiologic heterogeneity by ER for some established risk factors that are consistent across race and ethnicity groups. However, in non-White populations evidence is limited. Larger, more comparable data in diverse populations are needed to better characterize breast cancer etiologic heterogeneity.
AB - Background: Breast cancer consists of distinct molecular subtypes. Studies have reported differences in risk factor associations with breast cancer subtypes, especially by tumor estrogen receptor (ER) status, but their consistency across racial and ethnic populations has not been comprehensively evaluated. Methods: We conducted a qualitative, scoping literature review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis, extension for Scoping Reviews to investigate consistencies in associations between 18 breast cancer risk factors (reproductive, anthropometric, lifestyle, and medical history) and risk of ER-defined subtypes in women who self-identify as Asian, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latina, or White. We reviewed publications between January 1, 1990 and July 1, 2022. Etiologic heterogeneity evidence (convincing, suggestive, none, or inconclusive) was determined by expert consensus. Results: Publications per risk factor ranged from 14 (benign breast disease history) to 66 (parity). Publications were most abundant for White women, followed by Asian, Black or African American, and Hispanic or Latina women. Etiologic heterogeneity evidence was strongest for parity, followed by age at first birth, postmenopausal body mass index, oral contraceptive use, and estrogen-only and combined menopausal hormone therapy. Evidence was limited for other risk factors. Findings were consistent across racial and ethnic groups, although the strength of evidence varied. Conclusion: The literature supports etiologic heterogeneity by ER for some established risk factors that are consistent across race and ethnicity groups. However, in non-White populations evidence is limited. Larger, more comparable data in diverse populations are needed to better characterize breast cancer etiologic heterogeneity.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85208632140
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85208632140#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1093/jnci/djae172
DO - 10.1093/jnci/djae172
M3 - Article
C2 - 39018167
AN - SCOPUS:85208632140
SN - 0027-8874
VL - 116
SP - 1992
EP - 2002
JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
IS - 12
ER -