Retroperitoneal injuries: Pitfalls in diagnosis and management

Kimball I. Maull, Grace S. Rozycki, G. O’Neal Vinsant, Randall E. Pedigo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations


Retroperitoneal injury caused by penetrating trauma or associated with progressive shock following blunt trauma is usually recognized promptly and managed appropriately. Isolated retroperitoneal injury from blunt trauma, unless accompanied by major hemorrhage or gross hematuria, is often difficult to diagnose and needed treatment may be delayed. Although clinical examination remains the cornerstone of diagnosis, the high incidence of ethanol abuse and/or concurrent head injury in trauma patients has led to increased use of computed tomography in the diagnosis of abdominal trauma. To determine the effect, if any, of CT examination on the diagnosis and management of retroperitoneal trauma, we reviewed our patient experience. During the 16-month period ending in April 1986, 135 patients sustained 177 retroperitoneal injuries (116 by blunt and 19 by penetrating trauma). There were 26 deaths (19% mortality). There were 90 pelvic fractures and 31 lumbar spine fractures, as well as 21 genitourinary, 12 gastrointestinal, five pancreatic, and eight major vascular injuries. Ten patients had isolated retroperitoneal hematomas. We conclude that (1) patients with retroperitoneal injuries and coexisting intraperitoneal injuries should have early operation; (2) isolated retroperitoneal trauma tends to lead to observation unless CT is used as part of the early assessment; and (3) routine use of CT in patients at risk accurately defines the extent of injury and enhances clinical management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1111-1115
Number of pages5
JournalSouthern medical journal
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1987
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Retroperitoneal injuries: Pitfalls in diagnosis and management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this