Response to Bodin and Grote regarding postdoctoral recruitment in clinical neuropsychology

Aaron Nelson; Robert M. Bilder; Margaret O'Connor; Jason Brandt; Sandra Weintraub; Russell M. Bauer

doi:10.1080/13854046.2016.1188990

Response to Bodin and Grote regarding postdoctoral recruitment in clinical neuropsychology

Aaron Nelson, Robert M. Bilder, Margaret O'Connor, Jason Brandt, Sandra Weintraub, Russell M. Bauer

School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Bodin and Grote convey their opinion that the field of clinical neuropsychology would be best served by a match system for recruitment into postdoctoral training. We critically review their arguments and offer an alternative point of view. Our view considers the current state of the match system in neuropsychology, incorporates comparisons with other disciplines that rely on a match system, and addresses the role of postdoctoral training and the specialization that takes shape at this level. We make recommendations aimed at promoting greater unity among postdoctoral training programs with the goal of focusing leadership efforts on advancing our shared mission of providing the highest quality training in clinical neuropsychology.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1-9
Number of pages	9
Journal	Clinical Neuropsychologist
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1188990
State	Accepted/In press - May 31 2016

Keywords

match
Neuropsychology
postdoctoral
recruitment
training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Psychiatry and Mental health
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Clinical Psychology
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Developmental and Educational Psychology

Access to Document

10.1080/13854046.2016.1188990

Cite this

@article{77d4fbe5d78448cf88319c238680879c,

title = "Response to Bodin and Grote regarding postdoctoral recruitment in clinical neuropsychology",

abstract = "Bodin and Grote convey their opinion that the field of clinical neuropsychology would be best served by a match system for recruitment into postdoctoral training. We critically review their arguments and offer an alternative point of view. Our view considers the current state of the match system in neuropsychology, incorporates comparisons with other disciplines that rely on a match system, and addresses the role of postdoctoral training and the specialization that takes shape at this level. We make recommendations aimed at promoting greater unity among postdoctoral training programs with the goal of focusing leadership efforts on advancing our shared mission of providing the highest quality training in clinical neuropsychology.",

keywords = "match, Neuropsychology, postdoctoral, recruitment, training",

author = "Aaron Nelson and Bilder, {Robert M.} and Margaret O'Connor and Jason Brandt and Sandra Weintraub and Bauer, {Russell M.}",

year = "2016",

month = may,

day = "31",

doi = "10.1080/13854046.2016.1188990",

language = "English (US)",

pages = "1--9",

journal = "Clinical Neuropsychologist",

issn = "1385-4046",

publisher = "Swets & Zeitlinger",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Bodin and Grote regarding postdoctoral recruitment in clinical neuropsychology

AU - Nelson, Aaron

AU - Bilder, Robert M.

AU - O'Connor, Margaret

AU - Brandt, Jason

AU - Weintraub, Sandra

AU - Bauer, Russell M.

PY - 2016/5/31

Y1 - 2016/5/31

N2 - Bodin and Grote convey their opinion that the field of clinical neuropsychology would be best served by a match system for recruitment into postdoctoral training. We critically review their arguments and offer an alternative point of view. Our view considers the current state of the match system in neuropsychology, incorporates comparisons with other disciplines that rely on a match system, and addresses the role of postdoctoral training and the specialization that takes shape at this level. We make recommendations aimed at promoting greater unity among postdoctoral training programs with the goal of focusing leadership efforts on advancing our shared mission of providing the highest quality training in clinical neuropsychology.

AB - Bodin and Grote convey their opinion that the field of clinical neuropsychology would be best served by a match system for recruitment into postdoctoral training. We critically review their arguments and offer an alternative point of view. Our view considers the current state of the match system in neuropsychology, incorporates comparisons with other disciplines that rely on a match system, and addresses the role of postdoctoral training and the specialization that takes shape at this level. We make recommendations aimed at promoting greater unity among postdoctoral training programs with the goal of focusing leadership efforts on advancing our shared mission of providing the highest quality training in clinical neuropsychology.

KW - match

KW - Neuropsychology

KW - postdoctoral

KW - recruitment

KW - training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973125317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973125317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13854046.2016.1188990

DO - 10.1080/13854046.2016.1188990

M3 - Article

C2 - 27240699

AN - SCOPUS:84973125317

SN - 1385-4046

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Clinical Neuropsychologist

JF - Clinical Neuropsychologist

ER -

Response to Bodin and Grote regarding postdoctoral recruitment in clinical neuropsychology

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this