TY - JOUR
T1 - Repeat catheter ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation
T2 - Electrophysiologic findings and clinical outcomes
AU - Daimee, Usama A.
AU - Akhtar, Tauseef
AU - Boyle, Thomas A.
AU - Jager, Leah
AU - Arbab-Zadeh, Armin
AU - Marine, Joseph E.
AU - Berger, Ronald D.
AU - Calkins, Hugh
AU - Spragg, David D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The funding for this study was provided in part by the Edward St. John Fund for AF Research, the Roz and Marvin H. Weiner and Family Foundation, the Dr. Francis P. Chiaramonte Foundation, the Marilyn and Christian Poindexter Arrhythmia Research Fund, Norbert and Louise Grunwald Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Fund, and the Mr. & Mrs. Larry Small AF Research Fund.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is successful in 60%–80% of optimal candidates, with many patients requiring repeat procedures. We performed a detailed examination of electrophysiologic findings and clinical outcomes associated with first repeat AF ablations in the era of contact force-sensing radiofrequency (RF) catheters. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients who underwent their first repeat AF ablations for symptomatic, recurrent AF at our center between 2013 and 2019. All repeat ablations were performed using contact force-sensing RF catheters. Pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections at repeat ablation and freedom from atrial arrhythmia 1 year after repeat ablation were evaluated. We further assessed these findings based on AF classification at the time of presentation for repeat ablation, index RF versus cryoballoon (CB) ablation, and duration (≥3 versus <3 years) between index and repeat procedures. Results: Among 300 patients, there were 136 (45.3%) who presented for their first repeat ablations in persistent AF. During repeat ablation, at least one PV reconnection was found in 257 (85.6%) patients, while 159 (53%) had three to four reconnections. There was a similar distribution of reconnections among patients with persistent versus paroxysmal AF (mean: 2.7 ± 1.3 vs. 2.9 ± 1.2; p =.341), index RF versus CB ablation (mean: 2.8 ± 1.3 vs. 2.9 ± 1.2; p =.553), and ≥3 versus <3 years between index and repeat procedures (mean: 3.0 ± 1.1 vs. 2.7 ± 1.3; p =.119). At repeat ablation, the PVs were re-isolated in all patients, and additional non-PV ablation was performed in 171 (57%) patients. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 1-year follow-up after repeat ablation was 66%, similar among those with persistent versus paroxysmal AF (65.4% vs. 66.5%; p =.720), index RF versus CB ablation (66.7% vs. 68.9%; p =.930), and ≥3 versus <3 years between index and repeat ablations (64.4% vs. 66.7%; p =.760). Major complications occurred in a total of 4 (1.3%) patients. Conclusion: In a contemporary cohort of patients receiving their first repeat AF ablations using contact force-sensing RF catheters, PV reconnections were common, and freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 66% at 1-year follow-up. The distributions of PV reconnections and rates of freedom from atrial arrhythmia were similar, based on persistent versus paroxysmal AF at presentation for repeat ablation, index RF versus CB ablation, and duration between index and repeat procedures. The incidence of major complications was very low.
AB - Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is successful in 60%–80% of optimal candidates, with many patients requiring repeat procedures. We performed a detailed examination of electrophysiologic findings and clinical outcomes associated with first repeat AF ablations in the era of contact force-sensing radiofrequency (RF) catheters. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients who underwent their first repeat AF ablations for symptomatic, recurrent AF at our center between 2013 and 2019. All repeat ablations were performed using contact force-sensing RF catheters. Pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections at repeat ablation and freedom from atrial arrhythmia 1 year after repeat ablation were evaluated. We further assessed these findings based on AF classification at the time of presentation for repeat ablation, index RF versus cryoballoon (CB) ablation, and duration (≥3 versus <3 years) between index and repeat procedures. Results: Among 300 patients, there were 136 (45.3%) who presented for their first repeat ablations in persistent AF. During repeat ablation, at least one PV reconnection was found in 257 (85.6%) patients, while 159 (53%) had three to four reconnections. There was a similar distribution of reconnections among patients with persistent versus paroxysmal AF (mean: 2.7 ± 1.3 vs. 2.9 ± 1.2; p =.341), index RF versus CB ablation (mean: 2.8 ± 1.3 vs. 2.9 ± 1.2; p =.553), and ≥3 versus <3 years between index and repeat procedures (mean: 3.0 ± 1.1 vs. 2.7 ± 1.3; p =.119). At repeat ablation, the PVs were re-isolated in all patients, and additional non-PV ablation was performed in 171 (57%) patients. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 1-year follow-up after repeat ablation was 66%, similar among those with persistent versus paroxysmal AF (65.4% vs. 66.5%; p =.720), index RF versus CB ablation (66.7% vs. 68.9%; p =.930), and ≥3 versus <3 years between index and repeat ablations (64.4% vs. 66.7%; p =.760). Major complications occurred in a total of 4 (1.3%) patients. Conclusion: In a contemporary cohort of patients receiving their first repeat AF ablations using contact force-sensing RF catheters, PV reconnections were common, and freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 66% at 1-year follow-up. The distributions of PV reconnections and rates of freedom from atrial arrhythmia were similar, based on persistent versus paroxysmal AF at presentation for repeat ablation, index RF versus CB ablation, and duration between index and repeat procedures. The incidence of major complications was very low.
KW - atrial arrhythmia recurrence
KW - duration between repeat procedures
KW - index ablation modality
KW - persistent atrial fibrillation
KW - repeat ablation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101468660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101468660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jce.14867
DO - 10.1111/jce.14867
M3 - Article
C2 - 33410561
AN - SCOPUS:85101468660
SN - 1045-3873
VL - 32
SP - 628
EP - 638
JO - Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
JF - Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
IS - 3
ER -