TY - JOUR
T1 - Reducing deep sedation and delirium in acute lung injury patients
T2 - A quality improvement project
AU - Hager, David N.
AU - Dinglas, Victor D.
AU - Subhas, Shilta
AU - Rowden, Annette M.
AU - Neufeld, Karin J.
AU - Bienvenu, O. Joseph
AU - Touradji, Pegah
AU - Colantuoni, Elizabeth
AU - Reddy, Dereddi R.S.
AU - Brower, Roy G.
AU - Needham, Dale M.
PY - 2013/6
Y1 - 2013/6
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Deep sedation and delirium are common in the ICU. Mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury are at especially high risk for deep sedation, delirium, and associated long-term physical and neuropsychiatric impairments. We undertook an ICU-wide structured quality improvement project to decrease sedation and delirium. DESIGN: Prospective quality improvement project in comparison with a retrospective acute lung injury control group. SETTING: Sixteen-bed medical ICU in an academic teaching hospital with pre-existing use of goal-directed sedation with daily interruption of sedative infusions. PATIENTS: Consecutive acute lung injury patients. INTERVENTION: A "4Es" framework (engage, educate, execute, evaluate) was used as part of the quality improvement process. A new sedation protocol was created and implemented, which recommends a target Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score of 0 (alert and calm) and requires failure of intermittent sedative dosing prior to starting continuous infusions. In addition, twice-daily delirium screening using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU was introduced into routine practice. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sedative use and delirium status in acute lung injury patients after implementation of the quality improvement project (n = 82) were compared with a historical control group (n = 120). During the quality improvement vs. control periods, use of narcotic and benzodiazepine infusions were substantially lower (median proportion of medical ICU days per patient: 33% vs. 74%, and 22% vs. 70%, respectively, both p < 0.001). Further, wakefulness increased (median Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score per patient: -1.5 vs. -4.0, p < 0.001), and days awake and not delirious increased (median proportion of medical ICU days per patient: 19% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Through a structured quality improvement process, use of sedative infusions can be substantially decreased and days awake without delirium significantly increased, even in severely ill, mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury.
AB - OBJECTIVE: Deep sedation and delirium are common in the ICU. Mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury are at especially high risk for deep sedation, delirium, and associated long-term physical and neuropsychiatric impairments. We undertook an ICU-wide structured quality improvement project to decrease sedation and delirium. DESIGN: Prospective quality improvement project in comparison with a retrospective acute lung injury control group. SETTING: Sixteen-bed medical ICU in an academic teaching hospital with pre-existing use of goal-directed sedation with daily interruption of sedative infusions. PATIENTS: Consecutive acute lung injury patients. INTERVENTION: A "4Es" framework (engage, educate, execute, evaluate) was used as part of the quality improvement process. A new sedation protocol was created and implemented, which recommends a target Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score of 0 (alert and calm) and requires failure of intermittent sedative dosing prior to starting continuous infusions. In addition, twice-daily delirium screening using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU was introduced into routine practice. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sedative use and delirium status in acute lung injury patients after implementation of the quality improvement project (n = 82) were compared with a historical control group (n = 120). During the quality improvement vs. control periods, use of narcotic and benzodiazepine infusions were substantially lower (median proportion of medical ICU days per patient: 33% vs. 74%, and 22% vs. 70%, respectively, both p < 0.001). Further, wakefulness increased (median Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score per patient: -1.5 vs. -4.0, p < 0.001), and days awake and not delirious increased (median proportion of medical ICU days per patient: 19% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Through a structured quality improvement process, use of sedative infusions can be substantially decreased and days awake without delirium significantly increased, even in severely ill, mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury.
KW - acute lung injury
KW - adult
KW - critical illness
KW - deep sedation
KW - delirium
KW - quality improvement
KW - respiratory distress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878533734&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878533734&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827ca949
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827ca949
M3 - Article
C2 - 23507716
AN - SCOPUS:84878533734
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 41
SP - 1435
EP - 1442
JO - Critical care medicine
JF - Critical care medicine
IS - 6
ER -