Redo antireflux surgery

Brett Parker, Kevin Reavis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (ARS) has become the gold standard for medically refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD]. Though primary ARS has excellent safety and outcomes, up to 10% of patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication will eventually require reoperative antireflux surgery (redo-ARS). Laparoscopic redo-ARS is notoriously difficult with higher complication rates and worse outcomes when compared to the primary operation, and requires a thorough understanding of the surgical options and a high level of surgical skills. It is crucial for the surgeon and the patient to come to an agreement on postoperative expectations prior to embarking with revisional surgery, with a clear understanding that outcomes are generally worse after redo-ARS. Despite the technical challenges redo-ARS presents, when performed at a high-volume center, more than 80% of patients report satisfaction with their revision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationBenign Esophageal Disease
Subtitle of host publicationModern Surgical Approaches and Techniques
PublisherSpringer
Pages71-89
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9783030514891
ISBN (Print)9783030514884
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 12 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • EndoFLIP
  • Failed fundoplication
  • GERD
  • LINX
  • Nissen
  • Recurrent hiatal hernia
  • Redo antireflux surgery
  • TIF

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Redo antireflux surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this