Abstract
Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (ARS) has become the gold standard for medically refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD]. Though primary ARS has excellent safety and outcomes, up to 10% of patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication will eventually require reoperative antireflux surgery (redo-ARS). Laparoscopic redo-ARS is notoriously difficult with higher complication rates and worse outcomes when compared to the primary operation, and requires a thorough understanding of the surgical options and a high level of surgical skills. It is crucial for the surgeon and the patient to come to an agreement on postoperative expectations prior to embarking with revisional surgery, with a clear understanding that outcomes are generally worse after redo-ARS. Despite the technical challenges redo-ARS presents, when performed at a high-volume center, more than 80% of patients report satisfaction with their revision.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Benign Esophageal Disease |
Subtitle of host publication | Modern Surgical Approaches and Techniques |
Publisher | Springer |
Pages | 71-89 |
Number of pages | 19 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9783030514891 |
ISBN (Print) | 9783030514884 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 12 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- EndoFLIP
- Failed fundoplication
- GERD
- LINX
- Nissen
- Recurrent hiatal hernia
- Redo antireflux surgery
- TIF
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine