TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconceptualizing women’s and girls’ empowerment
T2 - A cross-cultural index for measuring progress toward improved sexual and reproductive health
AU - Moreau, Caroline
AU - Karp, Celia
AU - Wood, Shannon N.
AU - Galadanci, Hadiza
AU - Kibira, Simon Peter Sebina
AU - Makumbi, Fredrick
AU - Omoluabi, Elizabeth
AU - Shiferaw, Solomon
AU - Seme, Assefa
AU - Tsui, Amy
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health as part of the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 (OPP1079004) and PMA Plus (OPP1163880) projects. The authors thank Selamawit Desta and Qian-Li Xue for support during data collection and analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the Guttmacher Institute. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - CONTEXT: Improving women’s empowerment is pivotal to public health and development programs; however, inconsistent definitions and lack of cross-cultural measures compromise monitoring efforts. METHODS: Data collected in 2017–2018 in Ethiopia, Uganda and two sites in Nigeria were used to develop a cross-cultural index of women’s and girls’ empowerment in sexual and reproductive health (WGE-SRH). Item development was grounded in qualitative interviews, and informed by a conceptual framework that included domains of existence of choice and exercise of choice related to sex, contraceptive use and pregnancy. Items were pilot tested among 1,229 women aged 15–49 across sites. Psychometric properties were explored to identify crosssite constructs, and logistic regression was used to assess the construct validity of each dimension. RESULTS: Analyses identified subscales for sexual existence of choice (Cronbach’s alphas, 0.71–0.79) and contraceptive existence of choice (0.56–0.78). A pregnancy existence of choice subscale emerged for only two sites (0.61–0.80). Internal reliability of the exercise of choice subscales varied. Construct validity analyses found that for some sites, high scores on the sexual and contraceptive existence of choice subscales were associated with elevated odds of volitional sex and contraceptive use, respectively. Combining the existence of choice and exercise of choice summary scores for sex strengthened associations with volitional sex. CONCLUSIONS: The cross-cultural WGE-SRH index can be used to assess existence of choice related to contraception and volitional sex. Further work is needed to improve measures of SRH exercise of choice, and investigate the index’s multidimensionality and associations with SRH outcomes.
AB - CONTEXT: Improving women’s empowerment is pivotal to public health and development programs; however, inconsistent definitions and lack of cross-cultural measures compromise monitoring efforts. METHODS: Data collected in 2017–2018 in Ethiopia, Uganda and two sites in Nigeria were used to develop a cross-cultural index of women’s and girls’ empowerment in sexual and reproductive health (WGE-SRH). Item development was grounded in qualitative interviews, and informed by a conceptual framework that included domains of existence of choice and exercise of choice related to sex, contraceptive use and pregnancy. Items were pilot tested among 1,229 women aged 15–49 across sites. Psychometric properties were explored to identify crosssite constructs, and logistic regression was used to assess the construct validity of each dimension. RESULTS: Analyses identified subscales for sexual existence of choice (Cronbach’s alphas, 0.71–0.79) and contraceptive existence of choice (0.56–0.78). A pregnancy existence of choice subscale emerged for only two sites (0.61–0.80). Internal reliability of the exercise of choice subscales varied. Construct validity analyses found that for some sites, high scores on the sexual and contraceptive existence of choice subscales were associated with elevated odds of volitional sex and contraceptive use, respectively. Combining the existence of choice and exercise of choice summary scores for sex strengthened associations with volitional sex. CONCLUSIONS: The cross-cultural WGE-SRH index can be used to assess existence of choice related to contraception and volitional sex. Further work is needed to improve measures of SRH exercise of choice, and investigate the index’s multidimensionality and associations with SRH outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092682941&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092682941&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1363/46e9920
DO - 10.1363/46e9920
M3 - Article
C2 - 33027031
AN - SCOPUS:85092682941
SN - 1944-0391
VL - 46
SP - 187
EP - 198
JO - International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
JF - International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
ER -