TY - JOUR
T1 - Real-life safety of 5-grass pollen tablet in 5-to-9-year-old children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
AU - Gerstlauer, Michael
AU - Szepfalusi, Zsolt
AU - Golden, David
AU - Geng, Bob
AU - de Blic, Jacques
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosures: M. Gerstlauer was a coordinating investigator in this study and has received consulting fees from ALK, Bencard, Boehringer Ingelheim, Allergopharma, and Stallergenes Greer. Z. Szepfalusi was a coordinating investigator in this study and has no conflicts of interest to declare. D. Golden has received grants from Stallergenes Greer. B. Geng has received consulting fees and grants from Stallergenes Greer. J. de Blic was a coordinating investigator in this study and has received consulting fees and grants from Stallergenes Greer; he has also been an Advisory Board Member for the following companies from which he has received personal fees and/or grants: ALK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi and GSK. Disclosures: M. Gerstlauer was a coordinating investigator in this study and has received consulting fees from ALK, Bencard, Boehringer Ingelheim, Allergopharma, and Stallergenes Greer. Z. Szepfalusi was a coordinating investigator in this study and has no conflicts of interest to declare. D. Golden has received grants from Stallergenes Greer. B. Geng has received consulting fees and grants from Stallergenes Greer. J. de Blic was a coordinating investigator in this study and has received consulting fees and grants from Stallergenes Greer; he has also been an Advisory Board Member for the following companies from which he has received personal fees and/or grants: ALK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi and GSK. Funding Sources: The study was sponsored by Stallergenes Greer, Antony, France. For this article, medical writing and editorial assistance were provided by Josiane Cognet-Sicé (Stallergenes Greer) and Jérôme Brooks (Aixial, Boulogne-Billancourt, France). The following are acknowledged: the investigators for their commitment in the study, the employees of Stallergenes Greer: Agnès Viatte, the clinical study manager, Michel Mélac, the medical monitor, and Sandrine Khairallah for biostatistical assistance. Dr Golden (Medstar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, MD), Dr Geng (Rady Children's Hospital Severe Asthma Clinic, San Diego, CA), and Kathy Abiteboul (Stallergenes Greer) provided significant input in the analyses and interpretation of the data. Disclosures: M. Gerstlauer was a coordinating investigator in this study and has received consulting fees from ALK, Bencard, Boehringer Ingelheim, Allergopharma, and Stallergenes Greer. Z. Szepfalusi was a coordinating investigator in this study and has no conflicts of interest to declare. D. Golden has received grants from Stallergenes Greer. B. Geng has received consulting fees and grants from Stallergenes Greer. J. de Blic was a coordinating investigator in this study and has received consulting fees and grants from Stallergenes Greer; he has also been an Advisory Board Member for the following companies from which he has received personal fees and/or grants: ALK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi and GSK. Funding Sources: The study was sponsored by Stallergenes Greer, Antony, France.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - Background: Although 5-grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy has a good safety profile in controlled clinical trials, additional safety information among pediatric patients in a real-world setting would be useful. Objective: To further document the safety of 5-grass tablet among children aged 5 to 9 years with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC). Methods: This multicenter, observational study included allergy immunotherapy-naïve 5- to 9-year-old children with grass pollen–induced ARC prescribed with 5-grass tablet daily (3-day dose escalation to 300 index of reactivity [IR]). Patients were followed up daily for safety and tolerability over the first 30 treatment days. Adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were analyzed descriptively. Results: Three hundred seven children (mean age, 7.1 years) were enrolled. Fifty-eight percent were confirmed as polysensitized, and 36% had mild-to-moderate asthma. Of 307 patients, 233 (76%) reported AEs, and 173/307 (56%) reported ADRs, most frequently mild application-site reactions (throat irritation, oral pruritus, oral paresthesia). Sixteen of 307 (5.2%) patients withdrew because of ADRs. In 143 of 173 (83%) patients, ADRs first occurred within 1 week of starting treatment. More than half of the ADRs lasted less than 2 days, and ADRs resolved spontaneously in 161 of 173 (93%) patients. Recurrences of ADRs were reported in 45 of 173 (26%) patients and were also mainly application-site reactions. No notable differences were found in ADRs related to whether patients had asthma at inclusion. Neither epinephrine use nor admission to intensive care unit was reported. Conclusion: The safety profile of 5-grass tablet in pediatric ARC patients aged 5 to 9 years was consistent with safety findings in older patients, most ADRs being at the application site and mild to moderate. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02295969; EUPAS registration number: 8104.
AB - Background: Although 5-grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy has a good safety profile in controlled clinical trials, additional safety information among pediatric patients in a real-world setting would be useful. Objective: To further document the safety of 5-grass tablet among children aged 5 to 9 years with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC). Methods: This multicenter, observational study included allergy immunotherapy-naïve 5- to 9-year-old children with grass pollen–induced ARC prescribed with 5-grass tablet daily (3-day dose escalation to 300 index of reactivity [IR]). Patients were followed up daily for safety and tolerability over the first 30 treatment days. Adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were analyzed descriptively. Results: Three hundred seven children (mean age, 7.1 years) were enrolled. Fifty-eight percent were confirmed as polysensitized, and 36% had mild-to-moderate asthma. Of 307 patients, 233 (76%) reported AEs, and 173/307 (56%) reported ADRs, most frequently mild application-site reactions (throat irritation, oral pruritus, oral paresthesia). Sixteen of 307 (5.2%) patients withdrew because of ADRs. In 143 of 173 (83%) patients, ADRs first occurred within 1 week of starting treatment. More than half of the ADRs lasted less than 2 days, and ADRs resolved spontaneously in 161 of 173 (93%) patients. Recurrences of ADRs were reported in 45 of 173 (26%) patients and were also mainly application-site reactions. No notable differences were found in ADRs related to whether patients had asthma at inclusion. Neither epinephrine use nor admission to intensive care unit was reported. Conclusion: The safety profile of 5-grass tablet in pediatric ARC patients aged 5 to 9 years was consistent with safety findings in older patients, most ADRs being at the application site and mild to moderate. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02295969; EUPAS registration number: 8104.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067420385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067420385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.anai.2019.04.011
DO - 10.1016/j.anai.2019.04.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 31009701
AN - SCOPUS:85067420385
SN - 1081-1206
VL - 123
SP - 70
EP - 80
JO - Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
JF - Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
IS - 1
ER -