TY - JOUR
T1 - Re-irradiation for malignant glioma
T2 - Toward patient selection and defining treatment parameters for salvage
AU - Shen, Colette J.
AU - Kummerlowe, Megan N.
AU - Redmond, Kristin J.
AU - Martinez-Gutierrez, Juan Carlos
AU - Usama, Syed Muhammad
AU - Holdhoff, Matthias
AU - Grossman, Stuart A.
AU - Laterra, John J.
AU - Strowd, Roy E.
AU - Kleinberg, Lawrence R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Sources of support: This work was supported in part by the Nicholl Family Foundation.
Funding Information:
Conflicts of interest: Dr. Kristin J. Redmond reports grants from Elekta AB, grants and nonfinancial support from Accuray, and personal fees from AstraZeneca and Medtronic outside the submitted work. Dr. Lawrence R. Kleinberg reports grants and personal fees from Novocure and Accuray, and personal fees from Merck outside the submitted work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors on behalf of the American Society for Radiation Oncology
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Purpose: Reirradiation for recurrent glioma remains controversial without knowledge of optimal patient selection, dose, fractionation, and normal tissue tolerances. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes and toxicity after conventionally fractionated reirradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma, along with the impact of concurrent chemotherapy. Methods and materials: We conducted a retrospective review of patients reirradiated for high-grade glioma recurrence between 2007 and 2016 (including patients with initial low-grade glioma). Outcome metrics included overall survival (OS), prognostic factors for survival, and treatment-related toxicity. Results: Patients (n = 118; median age 47 years; median Karnofsky performance status score: 80) were re-treated at a median of 28 months (range, 5-214 months) after initial radiation therapy. The median reirradiation dose was 41.4 Gy (range, 12.6-54.0 Gy) to a median lesion volume of 202 cm3 (range, 20-901 cm3). The median cumulative (initial radiation and reirradiation combined) potential maximum brainstem dose was 76.9 Gy (range, 5.0-108.3 Gy) and optic apparatus dose was 56.0 Gy (range, 4.5-90.9 Gy). Of the patients, 56% received concurrent temozolomide, 14%, bevacizumab, and 11%, temozolomide plus bevacizumab; 19% had no chemotherapy. The planned reirradiation was completed by 90% of patients. Median OS from the completion of reirradiation was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5-11.7 months) for all patients and 14.0, 11.5, and 6.7 months for patients with initial grade 2, 3, and 4 glioma, respectively. On multivariate analysis, better OS was observed with a >24-month interval between radiation treatments (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.5; P <.001), reirradiation dose >41.4 Gy (HR: 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; P =.03), and gross total resection before reirradiation (HR: 0.6, 95% CI, 0.3-0.9; P =.02). Radiation necrosis and grade ≥3 late neurotoxicity were both minimal (<5%). No symptomatic persistent brainstem or optic nerve/chiasm injury was identified. Conclusions: Salvage reirradiation, even at doses >41.4 Gy in conventional fractionation, along with chemotherapy, was safe and well tolerated with meaningful survival duration. These data provide information that may be useful in implementing safe reirradiation treatments for appropriately selected patients and guiding future studies to define optimal reirradiation doses, maximal safe doses to critical structures, and the role of systemic therapy.
AB - Purpose: Reirradiation for recurrent glioma remains controversial without knowledge of optimal patient selection, dose, fractionation, and normal tissue tolerances. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes and toxicity after conventionally fractionated reirradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma, along with the impact of concurrent chemotherapy. Methods and materials: We conducted a retrospective review of patients reirradiated for high-grade glioma recurrence between 2007 and 2016 (including patients with initial low-grade glioma). Outcome metrics included overall survival (OS), prognostic factors for survival, and treatment-related toxicity. Results: Patients (n = 118; median age 47 years; median Karnofsky performance status score: 80) were re-treated at a median of 28 months (range, 5-214 months) after initial radiation therapy. The median reirradiation dose was 41.4 Gy (range, 12.6-54.0 Gy) to a median lesion volume of 202 cm3 (range, 20-901 cm3). The median cumulative (initial radiation and reirradiation combined) potential maximum brainstem dose was 76.9 Gy (range, 5.0-108.3 Gy) and optic apparatus dose was 56.0 Gy (range, 4.5-90.9 Gy). Of the patients, 56% received concurrent temozolomide, 14%, bevacizumab, and 11%, temozolomide plus bevacizumab; 19% had no chemotherapy. The planned reirradiation was completed by 90% of patients. Median OS from the completion of reirradiation was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5-11.7 months) for all patients and 14.0, 11.5, and 6.7 months for patients with initial grade 2, 3, and 4 glioma, respectively. On multivariate analysis, better OS was observed with a >24-month interval between radiation treatments (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.5; P <.001), reirradiation dose >41.4 Gy (HR: 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; P =.03), and gross total resection before reirradiation (HR: 0.6, 95% CI, 0.3-0.9; P =.02). Radiation necrosis and grade ≥3 late neurotoxicity were both minimal (<5%). No symptomatic persistent brainstem or optic nerve/chiasm injury was identified. Conclusions: Salvage reirradiation, even at doses >41.4 Gy in conventional fractionation, along with chemotherapy, was safe and well tolerated with meaningful survival duration. These data provide information that may be useful in implementing safe reirradiation treatments for appropriately selected patients and guiding future studies to define optimal reirradiation doses, maximal safe doses to critical structures, and the role of systemic therapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052615373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052615373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.adro.2018.06.005
DO - 10.1016/j.adro.2018.06.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 30370358
AN - SCOPUS:85052615373
SN - 2452-1094
VL - 3
SP - 582
EP - 590
JO - Advances in Radiation Oncology
JF - Advances in Radiation Oncology
IS - 4
ER -