TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiation and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy
T2 - Radiosensitisation and potential mechanisms of synergy
AU - Sharabi, Andrew B.
AU - Lim, Michael
AU - DeWeese, Theodore L.
AU - Drake, Charles G.
N1 - Funding Information:
CGD has consulted for Amplimmune, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and Roche-Genentech, all of whom have either anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 reagents in various stages of clinical development. Additionally, CGD has received sponsored research funding from BMS. ML has consulted for BMS and Accuray, and has received research support from BMS, Accuray, Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Altor, Aegenus, and Immunocellular. ABS and TLD declare no competing interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Checkpoint blockade immunotherapy has received mainstream attention as a result of striking and durable clinical responses in some patients with metastatic disease and a reasonable response rate in many tumour types. The activity of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy is not restricted to melanoma or lung cancer, and additional indications are expected in the future, with responses already reported in renal cancer, bladder cancer, and Hodgkin's lymphoma among many others. Additionally, the interactions between radiation and the immune system have been investigated, with several studies describing the synergistic effects on local and distant tumour control when radiation therapy is combined with immunotherapy. Clinical enthusiasm for this approach is strengthened by the many ongoing trials combining immunotherapy with definitive and palliative radiation. Herein, we discuss the biological and mechanistic rationale behind combining radiation with checkpoint blockade immunotherapy, with a focus on the preclinical data supporting this potentially synergistic combination. We explore potential hypotheses and important considerations for clinical trial designs. Finally, we reintroduce the notion of radiosensitising immunotherapy, akin to radiosensitising chemotherapy, as a potential definitive therapeutic modality.
AB - Checkpoint blockade immunotherapy has received mainstream attention as a result of striking and durable clinical responses in some patients with metastatic disease and a reasonable response rate in many tumour types. The activity of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy is not restricted to melanoma or lung cancer, and additional indications are expected in the future, with responses already reported in renal cancer, bladder cancer, and Hodgkin's lymphoma among many others. Additionally, the interactions between radiation and the immune system have been investigated, with several studies describing the synergistic effects on local and distant tumour control when radiation therapy is combined with immunotherapy. Clinical enthusiasm for this approach is strengthened by the many ongoing trials combining immunotherapy with definitive and palliative radiation. Herein, we discuss the biological and mechanistic rationale behind combining radiation with checkpoint blockade immunotherapy, with a focus on the preclinical data supporting this potentially synergistic combination. We explore potential hypotheses and important considerations for clinical trial designs. Finally, we reintroduce the notion of radiosensitising immunotherapy, akin to radiosensitising chemotherapy, as a potential definitive therapeutic modality.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953874197&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953874197&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00007-8
DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00007-8
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26433823
AN - SCOPUS:84953874197
SN - 1470-2045
VL - 16
SP - e498-e509
JO - The Lancet Oncology
JF - The Lancet Oncology
IS - 13
ER -