TY - JOUR
T1 - Race and Ethnicity and Diagnostic Testing for Common Conditions in the Acute Care Setting
AU - Ellenbogen, Michael I.
AU - Weygandt, P. Logan
AU - Newman-Toker, David E.
AU - Anderson, Andrew
AU - Rim, Nayoung
AU - Brotman, Daniel J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Ellenbogen MI et al. JAMA Network Open.
PY - 2024/8/27
Y1 - 2024/8/27
N2 - Importance: Overuse of diagnostic testing is pervasive, but the extent to which it varies by race and ethnicity in the acute care setting is poorly understood. Objective: To use a previously validated diagnostic intensity index to evaluate differences in diagnostic testing rates by race and ethnicity in the acute care setting, which may serve as a surrogate for diagnostic test overuse. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study of emergency department (ED) discharges, hospital observation stays, and hospital admissions using administrative claims among EDs and acute care hospitals in Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, and New Jersey, from 2016 through 2018. The diagnostic intensity index pairs nonspecific principal discharge diagnoses (nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, chest pain, and syncope) with related diagnostic tests to estimate rates of nondiagnostic testing. Adults with an acute care encounter with a principal discharge diagnosis of interest were included. Data were analyzed from January to February 2024. Exposure: Race and ethnicity (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White, other [including American Indian, multiracial, and multiethnic], and missing). Main Outcomes and Measures: Receipt of a diagnostic test. Generalized linear models with a hospital-specific indicator variable were estimated to calculate the adjusted odds ratio of receiving a test related to the principal discharge diagnosis by race and ethnicity, controlling for primary payer and zip code income quartile. Results: Of 3683055 encounters (1055575 encounters [28.7%] for Black, 300333 encounters [8.2%] for Hispanic, and 2140335 encounters [58.1%] for White patients; mean [SD] age of patients with encounters, 47.3 [18.8] years; 2233024 encounters among females [60.6%]), most (2969974 encounters [80.6%]) were ED discharges. Black compared with White patients discharged from the ED with a diagnosis of interest had an adjusted odds ratio of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.72-0.75) of having related diagnostic testing. No other racial or ethnic disparities of a similar magnitude were observed in any acute care settings. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, White patients discharged from the ED with a nonspecific diagnosis of interest were significantly more likely than Black patients to receive related diagnostic testing. The extent to which this represents diagnostic test overuse in White patients vs undertesting and missed diagnoses in Black patients deserves further study.
AB - Importance: Overuse of diagnostic testing is pervasive, but the extent to which it varies by race and ethnicity in the acute care setting is poorly understood. Objective: To use a previously validated diagnostic intensity index to evaluate differences in diagnostic testing rates by race and ethnicity in the acute care setting, which may serve as a surrogate for diagnostic test overuse. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study of emergency department (ED) discharges, hospital observation stays, and hospital admissions using administrative claims among EDs and acute care hospitals in Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, and New Jersey, from 2016 through 2018. The diagnostic intensity index pairs nonspecific principal discharge diagnoses (nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, chest pain, and syncope) with related diagnostic tests to estimate rates of nondiagnostic testing. Adults with an acute care encounter with a principal discharge diagnosis of interest were included. Data were analyzed from January to February 2024. Exposure: Race and ethnicity (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White, other [including American Indian, multiracial, and multiethnic], and missing). Main Outcomes and Measures: Receipt of a diagnostic test. Generalized linear models with a hospital-specific indicator variable were estimated to calculate the adjusted odds ratio of receiving a test related to the principal discharge diagnosis by race and ethnicity, controlling for primary payer and zip code income quartile. Results: Of 3683055 encounters (1055575 encounters [28.7%] for Black, 300333 encounters [8.2%] for Hispanic, and 2140335 encounters [58.1%] for White patients; mean [SD] age of patients with encounters, 47.3 [18.8] years; 2233024 encounters among females [60.6%]), most (2969974 encounters [80.6%]) were ED discharges. Black compared with White patients discharged from the ED with a diagnosis of interest had an adjusted odds ratio of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.72-0.75) of having related diagnostic testing. No other racial or ethnic disparities of a similar magnitude were observed in any acute care settings. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, White patients discharged from the ED with a nonspecific diagnosis of interest were significantly more likely than Black patients to receive related diagnostic testing. The extent to which this represents diagnostic test overuse in White patients vs undertesting and missed diagnoses in Black patients deserves further study.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202533081&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85202533081&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.30306
DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.30306
M3 - Article
C2 - 39190305
AN - SCOPUS:85202533081
SN - 2574-3805
VL - 7
SP - e2430306
JO - JAMA Network Open
JF - JAMA Network Open
IS - 8
ER -