TY - JOUR
T1 - Questionnaire-based second-hand smoke assessment in adults
AU - Pérez-Ríos, Mónica
AU - Schiaffino, Anna
AU - López, María José
AU - Nebot, Manel
AU - Galán, Iñaki
AU - Fu, Marcela
AU - Martínez-Sánchez, José María
AU - Moncada, Albert
AU - Montes, Agustín
AU - Ariza, Carles
AU - Fernández, Esteve
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was partly supported by the Spanish Society of Epidemiology. EF, MF, AS, and JMMS are partly supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Government of Spain (grant RD06/ 0020/0089 for Thematic Network of Cooperative Research on Cancer, and grant PI081436) and the Ministry of Finance and Knowledge, Government of Catalonia (grant 2009SGR192).
PY - 2013/10
Y1 - 2013/10
N2 - Background: Numerous studies have assessed second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure but a gold standard remains to be established. This study aimed to review how SHS exposure has been assessed in adults in questionnaire-based epidemiological studies. Methods: A literature search of original papers in English, French, Italian or Spanish published from January 2000 to May 2011 was performed using PubMed. The variables recorded for each study included target population, sample size, validation of the SHS questions, study design and phrasing of every question used to assess SHS exposure. For each item, information such as the setting where exposure was assessed or the indicator used to ascertain SHS exposure was extracted. Results: We retrieved 977 articles, of which 335 matched the inclusion criteria. The main objective of 75.8% of the studies was to assess SHS exposure.The proportion of validated questions aiming to ascertain SHS exposure was 17.9%. Most studies collected data only for one (40.3%) or two settings (33.4%), most frequently the home (83.9%) and workplace (57%). The most commonly used indicator to ascertain exposure was the presence of smokers and 68.9% of the studies included an item to assess the intensity of SHS exposure. Conclusions: The variability in the indicators and items used to ascertain SHS exposure is very high, whereas the use of items derived from validated studies remains low. Identifying the diverse settings where SHS exposure may occur is essential to accurately assess exposure over time. A standard set of items to identify SHS exposure in distinct settings is needed.
AB - Background: Numerous studies have assessed second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure but a gold standard remains to be established. This study aimed to review how SHS exposure has been assessed in adults in questionnaire-based epidemiological studies. Methods: A literature search of original papers in English, French, Italian or Spanish published from January 2000 to May 2011 was performed using PubMed. The variables recorded for each study included target population, sample size, validation of the SHS questions, study design and phrasing of every question used to assess SHS exposure. For each item, information such as the setting where exposure was assessed or the indicator used to ascertain SHS exposure was extracted. Results: We retrieved 977 articles, of which 335 matched the inclusion criteria. The main objective of 75.8% of the studies was to assess SHS exposure.The proportion of validated questions aiming to ascertain SHS exposure was 17.9%. Most studies collected data only for one (40.3%) or two settings (33.4%), most frequently the home (83.9%) and workplace (57%). The most commonly used indicator to ascertain exposure was the presence of smokers and 68.9% of the studies included an item to assess the intensity of SHS exposure. Conclusions: The variability in the indicators and items used to ascertain SHS exposure is very high, whereas the use of items derived from validated studies remains low. Identifying the diverse settings where SHS exposure may occur is essential to accurately assess exposure over time. A standard set of items to identify SHS exposure in distinct settings is needed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884992960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884992960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/eurpub/cks069
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/cks069
M3 - Article
C2 - 22683770
AN - SCOPUS:84884992960
SN - 1101-1262
VL - 23
SP - 763
EP - 767
JO - European Journal of Public Health
JF - European Journal of Public Health
IS - 5
ER -