TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantification of peripapillary total retinal volume in pseudopapilledema and mild papilledema using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
AU - Fard, Masoud Aghsaei
AU - Fakhree, Sara
AU - Abdi, Parisa
AU - Hassanpoor, Narges
AU - Subramanian, Prem S.
N1 - Funding Information:
All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and the following were reported: P.S.S., expert witness testimony (various firms), grant support ( National Eye Institute , US Dept of Defense [pending], Novartis Pharmaceuticals ). Supported in part by an unrestricted grant to the Wilmer Eye Institute from Research to Prevent Blindness , New York, New York, USA. Contributions of authors: design of the study (P.S.S.); conduct of the study (M.A.F., S.F., P.A., N.H.); writing the article (M.A.F., P.S.S., S.F., P.A.); data collection (M.A.F., P.A.); data analysis (M.A.F., P.S.S.).
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - Purpose To distinguish differences in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and peripapillary total retinal volume between eyes with papilledema, pseudopapilledema, and normal findings. Design Cohort study. Methods Forty-two eyes with mild papilledema, 37 eyes with congenitally elevated optic disc (pseudopapilledema), and 34 normal eyes met the inclusion criteria at 1 academic institution (in Iran) and underwent neuro-ophthalmic examination. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans surrounding the optic disc were performed in each eye of patients and subjects. Main outcome measures were mean RNFL thickness and peripapillary total retinal volume measurements (inner and outer ring volumes) that were compared between groups, using the generalized estimating equation approach. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves were also calculated. Results A statistically significant difference was found in mean RNFL thickness between both groups of patients with papilledema and pseudopapilledema and normal subjects. Average inner peripapillary total retinal volume in the papilledema, pseudopapilledema, and control groups were 1.95 ± 0.24 mm3, 1.81 ± 0.23 mm3, and 1.06 ± 0.10 mm3, respectively. Average outer peripapillary total retinal volume in the papilledema and pseudopapilledema groups were 2.68 ± 0.49 mm3 and 2.03 ± 0.24 mm3, respectively (P <.001). However, the outer ring peripapillary total retinal volume was not different between pseudopapilledema and normal (1.90 ± 0.11 mm 3) eyes (P =.17). Area under the curve to discriminate pseudopapilledema vs papilledema eyes for average RNFL thickness and inner and outer peripapillary total retinal volumes was 0.82, 0.68, and 0.88, respectively. Conclusion Outer peripapillary total retinal ring volumes might be useful in differentiating papilledema from pseudopapilledema.
AB - Purpose To distinguish differences in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and peripapillary total retinal volume between eyes with papilledema, pseudopapilledema, and normal findings. Design Cohort study. Methods Forty-two eyes with mild papilledema, 37 eyes with congenitally elevated optic disc (pseudopapilledema), and 34 normal eyes met the inclusion criteria at 1 academic institution (in Iran) and underwent neuro-ophthalmic examination. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans surrounding the optic disc were performed in each eye of patients and subjects. Main outcome measures were mean RNFL thickness and peripapillary total retinal volume measurements (inner and outer ring volumes) that were compared between groups, using the generalized estimating equation approach. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves were also calculated. Results A statistically significant difference was found in mean RNFL thickness between both groups of patients with papilledema and pseudopapilledema and normal subjects. Average inner peripapillary total retinal volume in the papilledema, pseudopapilledema, and control groups were 1.95 ± 0.24 mm3, 1.81 ± 0.23 mm3, and 1.06 ± 0.10 mm3, respectively. Average outer peripapillary total retinal volume in the papilledema and pseudopapilledema groups were 2.68 ± 0.49 mm3 and 2.03 ± 0.24 mm3, respectively (P <.001). However, the outer ring peripapillary total retinal volume was not different between pseudopapilledema and normal (1.90 ± 0.11 mm 3) eyes (P =.17). Area under the curve to discriminate pseudopapilledema vs papilledema eyes for average RNFL thickness and inner and outer peripapillary total retinal volumes was 0.82, 0.68, and 0.88, respectively. Conclusion Outer peripapillary total retinal ring volumes might be useful in differentiating papilledema from pseudopapilledema.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902549614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902549614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.03.008
DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.03.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 24727146
AN - SCOPUS:84902549614
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 158
SP - 136
EP - 143
JO - American journal of ophthalmology
JF - American journal of ophthalmology
IS - 1
ER -