Quality of life changes after lumbar decompression in patients with tandem spinal stenosis

Zach Pennington, Vincent J. Alentado, Daniel Lubelski, Matthew D. Alvin, Jay M. Levin, Edward C. Benzel, Thomas E. Mroz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is a degenerative spinal condition characterized by spinal canal narrowing at 2 or more distinct spinal levels. It is an aging-related condition that is likely to increase as the population ages, but which remains poorly described in the literature. Here we sought to determine the impact of primary lumbar decompression on quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in patients with symptomatic TSS. Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 803 patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of TSS treated between 2008 and 2014 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The records of patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of concurrent cervical and lumbar stenosis were reviewed. Prospectively gathered QOL data, including the Pain Disability Questionnaire (PDQ), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for low back pain, were assessed at the 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups. Results: Of 803 identified patients (mean age 66.2 years; 46.9% male), 19.6% underwent lumbar decompression only, 14.1% underwent cervical + lumbar decompression, and 66.4% underwent conservative management only. Baseline VAS scores were similar across all groups, but patients undergoing conservative management had better baseline QOL scores on all other measures. Both surgical cohorts experienced significant improvements in the VAS, PDQ, and EQ-5D at all time points; patients in the cervical + lumbar cohort also had significant improvement in the PHQ-9. Conservatively managed patients showed no significant improvement in QOL scores at any follow-up interval. Conclusion: Lumbar decompression with or without cervical decompression improves low back pain and QOL outcomes in patients with TSS. The decision to prioritize lumbar decompression is therefore unlikely to adversely affect long-term quality-of-life improvements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number105455
JournalClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Volume184
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2019

Keywords

  • Cervical stenosis
  • Lumbar spondylosis
  • Lumbar stenosis
  • Patient-reported outcomes
  • Quality-of-life
  • Tandem spinal stenosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of life changes after lumbar decompression in patients with tandem spinal stenosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this