TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality adjusted coverage of family planning services in low- and middle-income countries
T2 - Analysis of 33 countries using Demographic and Health Survey data
AU - Hazel, Elizabeth A.
AU - Jiwani, Safia
AU - Maïga, Abdoulaye
AU - Mady, Gouda Roland M.
AU - Wilson, Emily
AU - Mwinnyaa, George
AU - Amouzou, Agbessi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background Monitoring service quality for family planning programmes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been challenging due to data availability. Self-reported service quality from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) can provide additional information on quality beyond simple service contact. Methods The DHS collects need, use and counselling for contraceptives. We used this data from 33 LMICs to develop quality-adjusted demand for modern family planning satisfied indicator (DFPSq). We compared it with the crude indicator (demand for family planning satisfied (DFPS)) and performed an equity analysis. Median, interquartile ranges (IQR) and the absolute and relative gap by country were used to describe the findings. Results The median DFPS was 49% (IQR = 41–57%) and the median DPFSq was 19% (IQR = 14–27%). We found similar relative differences in the gap stratified by SES indicating quality was universally low. One exception is that adolescents had a higher relative gap (70%, IQR = 57–79%) compared to adults (54%, IQR = 46–68%), indicating lower quality access. Conclusions Severe and pervasive quality gaps exist in family planning services across most LMICs. Our novel DFPSq indicator is one additional tool for monitoring access and quality of service that is critical to meet the family planning needs of women.
AB - Background Monitoring service quality for family planning programmes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been challenging due to data availability. Self-reported service quality from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) can provide additional information on quality beyond simple service contact. Methods The DHS collects need, use and counselling for contraceptives. We used this data from 33 LMICs to develop quality-adjusted demand for modern family planning satisfied indicator (DFPSq). We compared it with the crude indicator (demand for family planning satisfied (DFPS)) and performed an equity analysis. Median, interquartile ranges (IQR) and the absolute and relative gap by country were used to describe the findings. Results The median DFPS was 49% (IQR = 41–57%) and the median DPFSq was 19% (IQR = 14–27%). We found similar relative differences in the gap stratified by SES indicating quality was universally low. One exception is that adolescents had a higher relative gap (70%, IQR = 57–79%) compared to adults (54%, IQR = 46–68%), indicating lower quality access. Conclusions Severe and pervasive quality gaps exist in family planning services across most LMICs. Our novel DFPSq indicator is one additional tool for monitoring access and quality of service that is critical to meet the family planning needs of women.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85197155016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85197155016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7189/JOGH.14.04125
DO - 10.7189/JOGH.14.04125
M3 - Article
C2 - 38939949
AN - SCOPUS:85197155016
SN - 2047-2978
VL - 14
JO - Journal of global health
JF - Journal of global health
M1 - 04125
ER -