TY - JOUR
T1 - Publication Trends and Surgeon Perceptions
T2 - A Comprehensive Analysis of Gender Disparities in Craniofacial Surgery
AU - MacIsaac, Molly F.
AU - Khan, Iman F.
AU - Tiongco, Rafael Felix P.
AU - Wright, Joshua M.
AU - Qamar, Fatima
AU - Cooney, Carisa M.
AU - Redett, Richard J.
AU - Halsey, Jordan N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objective : In academic craniofacial surgery, gender disparities exist across various metrics including faculty positions, leadership roles, and conference representation. This study benchmarks the academic productivity of craniofacial surgeons in 2022 and surveys their perspectives regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Design : Total, first author, and senior author PubMed publications in 2022 were recorded for 193 craniofacial attendings and fellows. Craniofacial surgeons were also surveyed regarding academic experience, leadership roles, and DEI perceptions. Setting : Electronic Survey Participants : 26 craniofacial attendings Main outcome measures : Total, first author, and senior author publication counts in 2022 Results : Women comprised 27% (n = 53) of the craniofacial surgeon cohort. Men led total publications (81% vs 19%, p < 0.001), senior-author publications (84% vs 16%, p < 0.001), average total publications (6.6 vs 4.0, p = 0.043), and average senior-author publications (3.1 vs 1.5, p = 0.02). Sub-analysis of craniofacial fellows showed a higher proportion of women (65%) with no statistical difference in total or average publication counts. Survey responses (n = 26) included a perceived lack of female representation in academic and leadership roles. Barriers included inadequate support from current leadership, systemic issues, and biases. Recommendations for improvement included mentorship programs, targeted recruitment, and equitable conference speaker selection. Conclusion : Ongoing gender disparities are evident in craniofacial surgery, particularly in academic metrics. However, trends in younger cohorts exhibit more balanced gender representation, publication records, and leadership positions, indicating potential improvements. Further studies are needed to examine these cohorts more comprehensively and longitudinally. Sustained commitment, including mentorship programs and enhanced DEI efforts, is needed to continue this progress.
AB - Objective : In academic craniofacial surgery, gender disparities exist across various metrics including faculty positions, leadership roles, and conference representation. This study benchmarks the academic productivity of craniofacial surgeons in 2022 and surveys their perspectives regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Design : Total, first author, and senior author PubMed publications in 2022 were recorded for 193 craniofacial attendings and fellows. Craniofacial surgeons were also surveyed regarding academic experience, leadership roles, and DEI perceptions. Setting : Electronic Survey Participants : 26 craniofacial attendings Main outcome measures : Total, first author, and senior author publication counts in 2022 Results : Women comprised 27% (n = 53) of the craniofacial surgeon cohort. Men led total publications (81% vs 19%, p < 0.001), senior-author publications (84% vs 16%, p < 0.001), average total publications (6.6 vs 4.0, p = 0.043), and average senior-author publications (3.1 vs 1.5, p = 0.02). Sub-analysis of craniofacial fellows showed a higher proportion of women (65%) with no statistical difference in total or average publication counts. Survey responses (n = 26) included a perceived lack of female representation in academic and leadership roles. Barriers included inadequate support from current leadership, systemic issues, and biases. Recommendations for improvement included mentorship programs, targeted recruitment, and equitable conference speaker selection. Conclusion : Ongoing gender disparities are evident in craniofacial surgery, particularly in academic metrics. However, trends in younger cohorts exhibit more balanced gender representation, publication records, and leadership positions, indicating potential improvements. Further studies are needed to examine these cohorts more comprehensively and longitudinally. Sustained commitment, including mentorship programs and enhanced DEI efforts, is needed to continue this progress.
KW - craniofacial surgery
KW - ethics/health policies
KW - peers
KW - quality of life
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202896906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85202896906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/10556656241274020
DO - 10.1177/10556656241274020
M3 - Article
C2 - 39196652
AN - SCOPUS:85202896906
SN - 1055-6656
JO - Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal
JF - Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal
ER -