TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychophysiological reactions in hypertensive and arthritic patients
AU - Moos, Rudolf H.
AU - Engel, Bernard T.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknow/eo’,en?errfs-Research was conducted at the Cardiovascular Research Institute, at the University of California School of Medicine. The Rheumatic Disease Group and the Hypertension Clinic of the University of California School of Medicine were kind enough to permit the use of patients. This research was supported in part by funds made available through USPHS Grants ZM-7082, H-754 and H-6285. The authors wish to acknowledge their appreciation to Dr. Margaret Singer, who consulted on the selection of the phrases; to Betsy Inch. Elvyn Blair and Marjorie Holstein, whose assistance in the complicated data analyses was invaluable; and to Dr. Robert E. Harris, who made valuable suggestions during the preparation of the manuscript. Present address: Rudolf H. Moos, Ph.D., Dept. of Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
PY - 1962
Y1 - 1962
N2 - This study attempted to identify characteristics physiological response patterns to specific psychological stressors in two psychosomatic groups: essential hypertensives and rheumatoid arthritics. An attempt was made to establish conditioned reactions to meaningful, verbally presented stimuli, and then to test for sematic generaliztion. The particular stimuli were picked to be differentially poignant to the two groups. The physiological functions measured were systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, breathing rate, skin conductance and muscle groups, a symptomatic muscle group which was that group which had been giving the rheumatoid arthritic most pain during the past week (an anatomically corresponding muscle was measured in a hypertensive control patient); and an asymptomatic muscle group. There was no conditioning; however the two groups reacted differentially to the experimental procedures. The arthritics showed a higher level of muscle potential in their symptomatic muscles, whereas there were no differences between the two groups in levels of asymptomatic muscle potential. The arthritics showed greater reactivity in both muscles. The hypertensives, on the other hand, showed sustained elevations during stimulation and greater recovery during rest in the blood pressure measures. The arthritics showed higher heart rate and skin conductance levels and greater reactivity in skin conductance during conditioning than the hypertensives. There were no differences in physiological reactions to the different phrases. The arthritics, then, did not adapt in muscle tension whereas they did in blood pressure, and the hypertensives showed adaptation in muscle tension and sustained elevation in blood pressure. The results were discussed and it was concluded that they supported a theory of response specificity.
AB - This study attempted to identify characteristics physiological response patterns to specific psychological stressors in two psychosomatic groups: essential hypertensives and rheumatoid arthritics. An attempt was made to establish conditioned reactions to meaningful, verbally presented stimuli, and then to test for sematic generaliztion. The particular stimuli were picked to be differentially poignant to the two groups. The physiological functions measured were systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, breathing rate, skin conductance and muscle groups, a symptomatic muscle group which was that group which had been giving the rheumatoid arthritic most pain during the past week (an anatomically corresponding muscle was measured in a hypertensive control patient); and an asymptomatic muscle group. There was no conditioning; however the two groups reacted differentially to the experimental procedures. The arthritics showed a higher level of muscle potential in their symptomatic muscles, whereas there were no differences between the two groups in levels of asymptomatic muscle potential. The arthritics showed greater reactivity in both muscles. The hypertensives, on the other hand, showed sustained elevations during stimulation and greater recovery during rest in the blood pressure measures. The arthritics showed higher heart rate and skin conductance levels and greater reactivity in skin conductance during conditioning than the hypertensives. There were no differences in physiological reactions to the different phrases. The arthritics, then, did not adapt in muscle tension whereas they did in blood pressure, and the hypertensives showed adaptation in muscle tension and sustained elevation in blood pressure. The results were discussed and it was concluded that they supported a theory of response specificity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000568890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000568890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0022-3999(62)90034-X
DO - 10.1016/0022-3999(62)90034-X
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0000568890
SN - 0022-3999
VL - 6
SP - 227
EP - 241
JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research
JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Research
IS - 4
ER -