TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder
T2 - Systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Oud, Matthijs
AU - Mayo-Wilson, Evan
AU - Braidwood, Ruth
AU - Schulte, Peter
AU - Jones, Steven H.
AU - Morriss, Richard
AU - Kupka, Ralph
AU - Cuijpers, Pim
AU - Kendall, Tim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016.
PY - 2016/3
Y1 - 2016/3
N2 - Background Psychological interventions may be beneficial in bipolar disorder. Aims To evaluate the efficacy of psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder. Method A systematic review of randomised controlled trials was conducted. Outcomes were meta-analysed using RevMan and confidence assessed using the GRADE method. Results We included 55 trials with 6010 participants. Moderate-quality evidence associated individual psychological interventions with reduced relapses at post-treatment (risk ratio (RR) = 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.92) and follow-up (RR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.87), and collaborative care with a reduction in hospital admissions (RR =0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.94). Low-quality evidence associated group interventions with fewer depression relapses at posttreatment and follow-up, and family psychoeducation with reduced symptoms of depression and mania. Conclusions There is evidence that psychological interventions are effective for people with bipolar disorder. Much of the evidence was of low or very low quality thereby limiting our conclusions. Further research should identify the most effective (and cost-effective) interventions for each phase of this disorder.
AB - Background Psychological interventions may be beneficial in bipolar disorder. Aims To evaluate the efficacy of psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder. Method A systematic review of randomised controlled trials was conducted. Outcomes were meta-analysed using RevMan and confidence assessed using the GRADE method. Results We included 55 trials with 6010 participants. Moderate-quality evidence associated individual psychological interventions with reduced relapses at post-treatment (risk ratio (RR) = 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.92) and follow-up (RR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.87), and collaborative care with a reduction in hospital admissions (RR =0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.94). Low-quality evidence associated group interventions with fewer depression relapses at posttreatment and follow-up, and family psychoeducation with reduced symptoms of depression and mania. Conclusions There is evidence that psychological interventions are effective for people with bipolar disorder. Much of the evidence was of low or very low quality thereby limiting our conclusions. Further research should identify the most effective (and cost-effective) interventions for each phase of this disorder.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960323723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960323723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.157123
DO - 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.157123
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26932483
AN - SCOPUS:84960323723
SN - 0007-1250
VL - 208
SP - 213
EP - 222
JO - British Journal of Psychiatry
JF - British Journal of Psychiatry
IS - 3
ER -