TY - JOUR
T1 - Provider Screening and Counseling for Intimate Partner Violence
T2 - A Systematic Review of Practices and Influencing Factors
AU - Alvarez, Carmen
AU - Fedock, Gina
AU - Grace, Karen Trister
AU - Campbell, Jacquelyn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016.
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - Background: Primary care providers have an important role in identifying survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) and providing safety options. Routine screening rates by providers have been consistently low, indicating a need to better understand providers’ practices to ensure the translation of policy into clinical practice. Aim: This systematic review examines common themes regarding provider screening practices and influencing factors on these practices. Method: A literature search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search focused on research articles which met the following criteria: (1) health-care providers as participants, (2) provider reports on screening and counseling practices for IPV, and (3) were in English or Spanish. Results: A total of 35 studies were included in the review. Across studies, providers commonly acknowledged the importance of IPV screening yet often used only selective screening. Influencing factors on clinic, provider, and patient levels shaped the process and outcomes of provider screening practices. Overall, a great deal of variability exists in regard to provider screening practices. This variability may be due to a lack of clear system-level guidance for these practices and a lack of research regarding best practices. Conclusions: These findings suggest the necessity of more facilitative, clearly defined, and perhaps mandatory strategies to fulfill policy requirements. Future research directions are outlined to assist with these goals.
AB - Background: Primary care providers have an important role in identifying survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) and providing safety options. Routine screening rates by providers have been consistently low, indicating a need to better understand providers’ practices to ensure the translation of policy into clinical practice. Aim: This systematic review examines common themes regarding provider screening practices and influencing factors on these practices. Method: A literature search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search focused on research articles which met the following criteria: (1) health-care providers as participants, (2) provider reports on screening and counseling practices for IPV, and (3) were in English or Spanish. Results: A total of 35 studies were included in the review. Across studies, providers commonly acknowledged the importance of IPV screening yet often used only selective screening. Influencing factors on clinic, provider, and patient levels shaped the process and outcomes of provider screening practices. Overall, a great deal of variability exists in regard to provider screening practices. This variability may be due to a lack of clear system-level guidance for these practices and a lack of research regarding best practices. Conclusions: These findings suggest the necessity of more facilitative, clearly defined, and perhaps mandatory strategies to fulfill policy requirements. Future research directions are outlined to assist with these goals.
KW - counseling
KW - intimate partner violence
KW - providers
KW - screening
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85033479228
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85033479228#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1177/1524838016637080
DO - 10.1177/1524838016637080
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27036407
AN - SCOPUS:85033479228
SN - 1524-8380
VL - 18
SP - 479
EP - 495
JO - Trauma, Violence, and Abuse
JF - Trauma, Violence, and Abuse
IS - 5
ER -