Provider performance and facility readiness for managing infections in young infants in primary care facilities in rural Bangladesh

Jennifer A. Applegate, Salahuddin Ahmed, Meagan Harrison, Jennifer Callaghan-Koru, Mahfuza Mousumi, Nazma Begum, Mamun Ibne Moin, Taufique Joarder, Sabbir Ahmed, Joby George, Dipak K. Mitra, A. S.M. Nawshad Uddin Ahmed, Mohammod Shahidullah, Abdullah H. Baqui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


Background Neonatal infections remain a leading cause of newborn deaths globally. In 2015, WHO issued guidelines for managing possible serious bacterial infection (PSBI) in young infants (0–59 days) using simplified antibiotic regimens when compliance with hospital referral is not feasible. Bangladesh was one of the first countries to adopt WHO’s guidelines for implementation. We report results of an implementation research study that assessed facility readiness and provider performance in three rural sub-districts of Bangladesh during August 2015-August 2016. Methods This study took place in 19 primary health centers. Facility readiness was assessed using checklists completed by study staff at three time points. To assess provider performance, we extracted data for all infection cases from facility registers and compared providers’ diagnosis and treatment against the guidelines. We plotted classification and dosage errors across the study period and superimposed a locally weighted smoothed (LOWESS) curve to analyze changes in performance over time. Focus group discussions (N = 2) and in-depth interviews (N = 28) with providers were conducted to identify barriers and facilitators for facility readiness and provider performance. Results At baseline, none of the facilities had adequate supply of antibiotics. During the 10-month period, 606 sick infants with signs of infection presented at the study facilities. Classification errors were identified in 14.9% (N = 90/606) of records. For infants receiving the first dose(s) of antibiotic treatment (N = 551), dosage errors were identified in 22.9% (N = 126/551) of the records. Distribution of errors varied by facility (35.7% [IQR: 24.7–57.4%]) and infection severity. Errors were highest at the beginning of the study period and decreased over time. Qualitative data suggest errors in early implementation were due to changes in providers’ assessment and treatment practices, including confusion about classifying an infant with multiple signs of infection, and some providers’ concerns about the efficacy of simplified antibiotic regimens. Conclusions Strategies to monitor early performance and targeted supports are important for enhancing implementation fidelity when introducing complex guidelines in new settings. Future research should examine providers’ assessment of effectiveness of simplified treatment and address misconceptions about superiority of broader spectrum antibiotics for treating community-acquired neonatal infections in this context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0229988
JournalPloS one
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General


Dive into the research topics of 'Provider performance and facility readiness for managing infections in young infants in primary care facilities in rural Bangladesh'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this