Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update

Kirsten L. Greene, Peter C. Albertsen, Richard J. Babaian, H. Ballentine Carter, Peter H. Gann, Misop Han, Deborah Ann Kuban, A. Oliver Sartor, Janet L. Stanford, Anthony Zietman, Peter Carroll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

67 Scopus citations


Purpose: We provide current information on the use of PSA testing for the evaluation of men at risk for prostate cancer, and the risks and benefits of early detection. Materials and Methods: The report is a summary of the American Urological Association PSA Best Practice Policy 2009. The summary statement is based on a review of the current professional literature, clinical experience and the expert opinions of a multispecialty panel. It is intended to serve as a resource for physicians, other health care professionals, and patients. It does not establish a fixed set of guidelines, define the legal standard of care or pre-empt physician judgment in individual cases. Results: There are two notable differences in the current policy. First, the age for obtaining a baseline PSA has been lowered to 40 years. Secondly, the current policy no longer recommends a single, threshold value of PSA, which should prompt prostate biopsy. Rather, the decision to proceed to prostate biopsy should be based primarily on PSA and DRE results, but should take into account multiple factors including free and total PSA, patient age, PSA velocity, PSA density, family history, ethnicity, prior biopsy history and comorbidities. Conclusions: Although recently published trials show different results regarding the impact of prostate cancer screening on mortality, both suggest that prostate cancer screening leads to overdetection and overtreatment of some patients. Therefore, men should be informed of the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening before biopsy and the option of active surveillance in lieu of immediate treatment for certain men diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S2-S11
JournalJournal of Urology
Issue number1 SUPPL
StatePublished - Jan 2013
Externally publishedYes


  • mass screening
  • neoplasm staging
  • prostate-specific antigen
  • prostatic neoplasms
  • treatment outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this