Prophylacti

Constantine Mavroudis; John M. Stulak; Niv Ad; Allison Siegel; Alessandro Giamberti; Louise Harris; Carl L. Backer; Sabrina Tsao; Joseph A. Dearani; Nihal Weerasena; Barbara J. Deal

doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.026

Prophylacti

Constantine Mavroudis, John M. Stulak, Niv Ad, Allison Siegel, Alessandro Giamberti, Louise Harris, Carl L. Backer, Sabrina Tsao, Joseph A. Dearani, Nihal Weerasena, Barbara J. Deal

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Specific congenital heart anomalies significantly increase the risk for late atrial arrhythmias, raising the question whether prophylactic arrhythmia operations should be incorporated into reparative open heart procedures. Currently no consensus exists regarding standard prophylactic arrhythmia procedures. Questions remain concerning the arrhythmia-specific lesions to perform, energy sources to use, need for atrial appendectomy, and choosing a right, left, or biatrial Maze procedure. These considerations are important because prophylactic arrhythmia procedures are performed without knowing if the patient will actually experience an arrhythmia. This review identifies congenital defects with a risk for the development of atrial arrhythmias and proposes standardizing lesion sets for prophylactic arrhythmia operations.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	352-359
Number of pages	8
Journal	Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume	99
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.026
State	Published - Jan 1 2015
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.026

Cite this

@article{7902a18e2d624fc7b8dfd57f76d5762b,

title = "Prophylacti",

abstract = "Specific congenital heart anomalies significantly increase the risk for late atrial arrhythmias, raising the question whether prophylactic arrhythmia operations should be incorporated into reparative open heart procedures. Currently no consensus exists regarding standard prophylactic arrhythmia procedures. Questions remain concerning the arrhythmia-specific lesions to perform, energy sources to use, need for atrial appendectomy, and choosing a right, left, or biatrial Maze procedure. These considerations are important because prophylactic arrhythmia procedures are performed without knowing if the patient will actually experience an arrhythmia. This review identifies congenital defects with a risk for the development of atrial arrhythmias and proposes standardizing lesion sets for prophylactic arrhythmia operations.",

author = "Constantine Mavroudis and Stulak, {John M.} and Niv Ad and Allison Siegel and Alessandro Giamberti and Louise Harris and Backer, {Carl L.} and Sabrina Tsao and Dearani, {Joseph A.} and Nihal Weerasena and Deal, {Barbara J.}",

year = "2015",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.026",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "99",

pages = "352--359",

journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",

issn = "0003-4975",

publisher = "Elsevier USA",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prophylacti

AU - Mavroudis, Constantine

AU - Stulak, John M.

AU - Ad, Niv

AU - Siegel, Allison

AU - Giamberti, Alessandro

AU - Harris, Louise

AU - Backer, Carl L.

AU - Tsao, Sabrina

AU - Dearani, Joseph A.

AU - Weerasena, Nihal

AU - Deal, Barbara J.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Specific congenital heart anomalies significantly increase the risk for late atrial arrhythmias, raising the question whether prophylactic arrhythmia operations should be incorporated into reparative open heart procedures. Currently no consensus exists regarding standard prophylactic arrhythmia procedures. Questions remain concerning the arrhythmia-specific lesions to perform, energy sources to use, need for atrial appendectomy, and choosing a right, left, or biatrial Maze procedure. These considerations are important because prophylactic arrhythmia procedures are performed without knowing if the patient will actually experience an arrhythmia. This review identifies congenital defects with a risk for the development of atrial arrhythmias and proposes standardizing lesion sets for prophylactic arrhythmia operations.

AB - Specific congenital heart anomalies significantly increase the risk for late atrial arrhythmias, raising the question whether prophylactic arrhythmia operations should be incorporated into reparative open heart procedures. Currently no consensus exists regarding standard prophylactic arrhythmia procedures. Questions remain concerning the arrhythmia-specific lesions to perform, energy sources to use, need for atrial appendectomy, and choosing a right, left, or biatrial Maze procedure. These considerations are important because prophylactic arrhythmia procedures are performed without knowing if the patient will actually experience an arrhythmia. This review identifies congenital defects with a risk for the development of atrial arrhythmias and proposes standardizing lesion sets for prophylactic arrhythmia operations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920565486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920565486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.026

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.026

M3 - Review article

C2 - 25442995

AN - SCOPUS:84920565486

SN - 0003-4975

VL - 99

SP - 352

EP - 359

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

IS - 1

ER -

Prophylacti

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this