TY - JOUR
T1 - Prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support and posttransplantation outcomes
T2 - A new challenge
AU - Fukuhara, Shinichi
AU - Takeda, Koji
AU - Polanco, Antonio R.
AU - Takayama, Hiroo
AU - Naka, Yoshifumi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Objective To assess outcomes after cardiac transplantation in patients receiving long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) support. Methods The United Network of Organ Sharing Database was used to identify 7808 heart transplant recipients between January 2011 and March 2014, 2456 (31.5%) of whom were bridged with CF-LVAD. Recipients were stratified by CF-LVAD duration: group 1, <1 year (n = 1590; 64.7%); group 2, 1 to 2 years (n = 599; 24.4%); and group 3, >2 years (n = 267; 10.9%). Results Compared with patients in groups 1 and 2, patients in group 3 spent more time as status 1A, had a greater body mass index and higher serum creatinine level, more often received blood transfusions and antibiotics, and more often developed device-related infection and life-threatening arrhythmia before transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed statistically significant lower survival rates in group 3 compared with groups 1 and 2, at both 30 days (92.9% vs 96.4% vs 95.5%; group 1 vs group 3, P =.009) and 2 years (78.9% vs 88.2% vs 86.3%; group 1 vs group 3, P =.001) posttransplantation. Multivariable analyses identified duration of CF-LVAD support as a significant factor for 2-year posttransplantation mortality (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.34; P =.040). Conclusions A bridge-to-transplant (BTT) strategy with a CF-LVAD has become standard care for patients with advanced heart failure. Duration of CF-LVAD support is associated with increased midterm mortality, warranting early transplantation in the modern BTT era.
AB - Objective To assess outcomes after cardiac transplantation in patients receiving long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) support. Methods The United Network of Organ Sharing Database was used to identify 7808 heart transplant recipients between January 2011 and March 2014, 2456 (31.5%) of whom were bridged with CF-LVAD. Recipients were stratified by CF-LVAD duration: group 1, <1 year (n = 1590; 64.7%); group 2, 1 to 2 years (n = 599; 24.4%); and group 3, >2 years (n = 267; 10.9%). Results Compared with patients in groups 1 and 2, patients in group 3 spent more time as status 1A, had a greater body mass index and higher serum creatinine level, more often received blood transfusions and antibiotics, and more often developed device-related infection and life-threatening arrhythmia before transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed statistically significant lower survival rates in group 3 compared with groups 1 and 2, at both 30 days (92.9% vs 96.4% vs 95.5%; group 1 vs group 3, P =.009) and 2 years (78.9% vs 88.2% vs 86.3%; group 1 vs group 3, P =.001) posttransplantation. Multivariable analyses identified duration of CF-LVAD support as a significant factor for 2-year posttransplantation mortality (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.34; P =.040). Conclusions A bridge-to-transplant (BTT) strategy with a CF-LVAD has become standard care for patients with advanced heart failure. Duration of CF-LVAD support is associated with increased midterm mortality, warranting early transplantation in the modern BTT era.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958582299&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958582299&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.024
DO - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 26896362
AN - SCOPUS:84958582299
SN - 0022-5223
VL - 151
SP - 872-880.e5
JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
IS - 3
ER -