TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic Factors in Clival Chordomas
T2 - An Integrated Analysis of 347 Patients
AU - Zou, Yingjie
AU - Neale, Natalie
AU - Sun, James
AU - Yang, Mo
AU - Bai, Harrison Xiao
AU - Tang, Lei
AU - Zhang, Zishu
AU - Landi, Alessandro
AU - Wang, Yinyan
AU - Huang, Raymond Y.
AU - Zhang, Paul J.
AU - Li, Xuejun
AU - Xiao, Bo
AU - Yang, Li
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflict of interest statement: This work was supported by Shenghua Yuying Project of Central South University to L.Y., Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2018JJ3709 to L.Y.) and Natural Science Foundation of China (81472594 and 81770781 to X.J.L.).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Objective: To investigate prognostic factors of clival chordoma using the largest patient set to date. Methods: Appropriate studies were identified per search criteria, data satisfying criteria were extracted, and survival analysis was performed to investigate prognostic factors of clival chordoma. Results: A total of 347 patients from the literature cohort met our inclusion criteria. Of 346 cases in which extent of resection was reported, gross total resection (GTR), subtotal resection, and biopsy were achieved in 118 (34.1%), 205 (59.2%), and 21 (6.1%) cases, respectively. Two (0.6%) subjects did not undergo surgery. Of 185 cases in which surgical approach was reported, 56 (30.3%) underwent an endoscopic transoral approach, 17 (9.2%) microscopic transsphenoidal, 45 (24.3%) endoscopic or microscopic, 45 (24.3%) craniotomy, and 22 (11.9%) other approaches. There was no significant difference in GTR rates of different surgical approaches (P = 0.101). Median follow-up was 46.6 months. The 5- and 10-year rates for progression-free survival (PFS) were 59.2% and 47.9%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year rates for overall survival (OS) were 77.3% and 63.9%, respectively. On multivariate analysis for both PFS and OS, GTR demonstrated significantly improved outcomes when compared with subtotal resection (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.22–0.90, P = 0.025 for PFS; hazard ratio 0.20, confidence interval 0.06–0.65, P = 0.008 for OS). Conclusions: GTR rates were comparable in different surgical approaches. GTR was a significant predictor of longer PFS and OS in clival chordoma.
AB - Objective: To investigate prognostic factors of clival chordoma using the largest patient set to date. Methods: Appropriate studies were identified per search criteria, data satisfying criteria were extracted, and survival analysis was performed to investigate prognostic factors of clival chordoma. Results: A total of 347 patients from the literature cohort met our inclusion criteria. Of 346 cases in which extent of resection was reported, gross total resection (GTR), subtotal resection, and biopsy were achieved in 118 (34.1%), 205 (59.2%), and 21 (6.1%) cases, respectively. Two (0.6%) subjects did not undergo surgery. Of 185 cases in which surgical approach was reported, 56 (30.3%) underwent an endoscopic transoral approach, 17 (9.2%) microscopic transsphenoidal, 45 (24.3%) endoscopic or microscopic, 45 (24.3%) craniotomy, and 22 (11.9%) other approaches. There was no significant difference in GTR rates of different surgical approaches (P = 0.101). Median follow-up was 46.6 months. The 5- and 10-year rates for progression-free survival (PFS) were 59.2% and 47.9%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year rates for overall survival (OS) were 77.3% and 63.9%, respectively. On multivariate analysis for both PFS and OS, GTR demonstrated significantly improved outcomes when compared with subtotal resection (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.22–0.90, P = 0.025 for PFS; hazard ratio 0.20, confidence interval 0.06–0.65, P = 0.008 for OS). Conclusions: GTR rates were comparable in different surgical approaches. GTR was a significant predictor of longer PFS and OS in clival chordoma.
KW - Chordoma
KW - Clival
KW - Extent of resection
KW - Surgical approach
KW - Survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050468953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050468953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.194
DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.194
M3 - Article
C2 - 29969746
AN - SCOPUS:85050468953
SN - 1878-8750
VL - 118
SP - e375-e387
JO - World neurosurgery
JF - World neurosurgery
ER -