TY - JOUR
T1 - Prioritizing future research on off-label prescribing
T2 - Results of a quantitative evaluation
AU - Walton, Surrey M.
AU - Schumock, Glen T.
AU - Lee, Ky Van
AU - Alexander, G. Caleb
AU - Meltzer, David
AU - Stafford, Randall S.
PY - 2008/12
Y1 - 2008/12
N2 - Study Objective. To develop a prioritized list of individual drugs for which future research regarding off-label uses is warranted. Design. Retrospective, cross-sectional study Data Sources. Commercial database that provides ongoing estimates of drug prescribing practices of office-based physicians in the United States and an Internet database of comprehensive evidence-based drug information. Measurements and Main Results. The base analyses incorporated three key factors based on the theory of value of information: volume of off-label use with inadequate evidence, drug safety, and cost and market considerations. Nationally representative prescribing data were used to estimate the number of off-label drug uses by indication from January 1, 2005-June 30, 2007, in the United States, and these indications were then categorized according to the adequacy of scientific support. Black-box warnings and safety alerts, drug cost, date of market entry, and marketing expenditures were also incorporated into the final model to produce a priority score. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying key model parameters. Our findings identified a high volume of off-label prescribing in the absence of good evidence for a substantial number of drugs, particularly antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anxiolytic-sedatives. Drugs that consistently ranked high in both our base model and sensitivity analyses were quetiapine, warfarin, escitalopram, risperidone, montelukast, bupropion, sertraline, venlafaxine, celecoxib, lisinopril, duloxetine, trazodone, olanzapine, and epoetin alfa. Conclusion. Future research into off-label drug use should focus on drugs used frequently with inadequate supporting evidence, particularly if further concerns are raised by known safety issues, high drug cost, recent market entry, and extensive marketing. Our quantitative analysis identified particular concerns with the off-label use of antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs. Targeted research and policy activities on our list of prioritized drugs have high potential value.
AB - Study Objective. To develop a prioritized list of individual drugs for which future research regarding off-label uses is warranted. Design. Retrospective, cross-sectional study Data Sources. Commercial database that provides ongoing estimates of drug prescribing practices of office-based physicians in the United States and an Internet database of comprehensive evidence-based drug information. Measurements and Main Results. The base analyses incorporated three key factors based on the theory of value of information: volume of off-label use with inadequate evidence, drug safety, and cost and market considerations. Nationally representative prescribing data were used to estimate the number of off-label drug uses by indication from January 1, 2005-June 30, 2007, in the United States, and these indications were then categorized according to the adequacy of scientific support. Black-box warnings and safety alerts, drug cost, date of market entry, and marketing expenditures were also incorporated into the final model to produce a priority score. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying key model parameters. Our findings identified a high volume of off-label prescribing in the absence of good evidence for a substantial number of drugs, particularly antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anxiolytic-sedatives. Drugs that consistently ranked high in both our base model and sensitivity analyses were quetiapine, warfarin, escitalopram, risperidone, montelukast, bupropion, sertraline, venlafaxine, celecoxib, lisinopril, duloxetine, trazodone, olanzapine, and epoetin alfa. Conclusion. Future research into off-label drug use should focus on drugs used frequently with inadequate supporting evidence, particularly if further concerns are raised by known safety issues, high drug cost, recent market entry, and extensive marketing. Our quantitative analysis identified particular concerns with the off-label use of antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs. Targeted research and policy activities on our list of prioritized drugs have high potential value.
KW - Off-label drug use
KW - Research prioritization
KW - Value of information
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57149085867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57149085867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1592/phco.28.12.1443
DO - 10.1592/phco.28.12.1443
M3 - Article
C2 - 19025425
AN - SCOPUS:57149085867
SN - 0277-0008
VL - 28
SP - 1443
EP - 1452
JO - Pharmacotherapy
JF - Pharmacotherapy
IS - 12
ER -