TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevention of vision-threatening complications in diabetic retinopathy
T2 - Two perspectives based on results from the DRCR Retina Network Protocol W and the Regeneron-sponsored PANORAMA
AU - Nanegrungsunk, Onnisa
AU - Bressler, Neil M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/11/1
Y1 - 2021/11/1
N2 - Purpose of reviewThe use of intravitreous antivascular endothelial growth factor to prevent center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) with vision loss and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) has been investigated and recently reported in two randomized clinical trials. Although both trials showed substantial superiority of aflibercept at preventing the development of vision-threatening complications (VTCs) of CI-DME or PDR compared with sham at 1 or 2 years, without a concomitant benefit in visual acuity outcomes, the interpretation of the results and its application to clinical practice resulted in two disparate opinions. In this review, we discuss these two trials including their similarities and differences, other relevant studies, and considerations regarding the interpretation and the application of these results into clinical practice.Recent findingsThe Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Retina Network Protocol W and the PANORAMA study demonstrated significantly lower probabilities of developing CI-DME or PDR at 2 years with intravitreous aflibercept compared with sham in eyes with moderate (Protocol W) or moderately severe (PANORAMA) to severe non-PDR (NPDR). However, visual acuity outcomes were not different.SummaryAlthough intravitreous aflibercept injections reduce the risk of VTCs in eyes with moderate-to-severe NPDR, the absence of visual acuity benefits supports the need for four-year results.
AB - Purpose of reviewThe use of intravitreous antivascular endothelial growth factor to prevent center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) with vision loss and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) has been investigated and recently reported in two randomized clinical trials. Although both trials showed substantial superiority of aflibercept at preventing the development of vision-threatening complications (VTCs) of CI-DME or PDR compared with sham at 1 or 2 years, without a concomitant benefit in visual acuity outcomes, the interpretation of the results and its application to clinical practice resulted in two disparate opinions. In this review, we discuss these two trials including their similarities and differences, other relevant studies, and considerations regarding the interpretation and the application of these results into clinical practice.Recent findingsThe Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Retina Network Protocol W and the PANORAMA study demonstrated significantly lower probabilities of developing CI-DME or PDR at 2 years with intravitreous aflibercept compared with sham in eyes with moderate (Protocol W) or moderately severe (PANORAMA) to severe non-PDR (NPDR). However, visual acuity outcomes were not different.SummaryAlthough intravitreous aflibercept injections reduce the risk of VTCs in eyes with moderate-to-severe NPDR, the absence of visual acuity benefits supports the need for four-year results.
KW - antivascular endothelial growth factor
KW - center-involved diabetic macular edema
KW - diabetic retinopathy
KW - prevention
KW - proliferative diabetic retinopathy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117702743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85117702743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000799
DO - 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000799
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34419979
AN - SCOPUS:85117702743
SN - 1040-8738
VL - 32
SP - 590
EP - 598
JO - Current opinion in ophthalmology
JF - Current opinion in ophthalmology
IS - 6
ER -